IE 6,7,8

[Mike Easter]

~BD~ wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> BoaterDave wrote:
>>
>>> What type of work might require the use of a browser with so many
>>> flaws?
>>
>> This is not a useful question, because it is based on the 'inner'
>> thoughts and unknown configuration or requirements of this cited person
>
> I'm afraid you are mistaken, Mike! At this link:-

So the purpose of this line of questioning/ thread/ was to draw us tinu
into a PF/BD interaction in test.here from 2009 Feb?

That thread does not contain the citation about IE6, and it wouldn't
matter if it did, because the nature of the thread was a BD/PF interaction.

In such interactions, I do not believe what PF is telling BD and I do
not believe how BD interprets PF.

So, (even) if PF said that to BD in some other thread at some other time
it would not be commentary worth evaluating.

>> ... which is what makes your question not useful and thus a waste of
>> time.
>
> As usual, he avoids answering simple questions so I guess you are right.



--
Mike Easter

[Buffalo]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>
> Once again, proving your troll status.

Yes he/she/it is.
Buffalo

[Mike Easter]

~BD~ wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:

>> In such interactions, I do not believe what PF is telling BD and I do
>> not believe how BD interprets PF.
>>
>> So, (even) if PF said that to BD in some other thread at some other time
>> it would not be commentary worth evaluating.
>>
>
> Peter Foldes said (recently) .......

Anything that starts with PF said to BD or BD said to PF is not worth
reading.


--
Mike Easter

[~BD~]

Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>>> In such interactions, I do not believe what PF is telling BD and I do
>>> not believe how BD interprets PF.
>>>
>>> So, (even) if PF said that to BD in some other thread at some other time
>>> it would not be commentary worth evaluating.
>>>
>>
>> Peter Foldes said (recently) .......
>
> Anything that starts with PF said to BD or BD said to PF is not worth
> reading.
>
>

You *did* read it though, Mike!

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:B92dnZwoZawENETRnZ2dnUVZ8imdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Mike Easter wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>
>>>> In such interactions, I do not believe what PF is telling BD and
>>>> I do not believe how BD interprets PF.
>>>>
>>>> So, (even) if PF said that to BD in some other thread at some
>>>> other time it would not be commentary worth evaluating.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Peter Foldes said (recently) .......
>>
>> Anything that starts with PF said to BD or BD said to PF is not
>> worth reading.
>>
>>
>
> You *did* read it though, Mike!
>

Are you keeping track of the amount of helpful persons you alienate and
turn away? It's painfully obvious you'll never get a clue.


--
Stupidity isn't a crime. So you're free to go.

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:B92dnZwoZawENETRnZ2dnUVZ8imdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In such interactions, I do not believe what PF is telling BD and
>>>>> I do not believe how BD interprets PF.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, (even) if PF said that to BD in some other thread at some
>>>>> other time it would not be commentary worth evaluating.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes said (recently) .......
>>>
>>> Anything that starts with PF said to BD or BD said to PF is not
>>> worth reading.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You *did* read it though, Mike!
>>
>
> Are you keeping track of the amount of helpful persons you alienate and
> turn away? It's painfully obvious you'll never get a clue.
>
>

Maybe it would be good if *you* were to explain why someone is using IE6
for business purposes, Dustin.

A WAG would be better than nothing at all.

[RayLopez99]

On Nov 9, 5:20*pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
wrote:
> From: "~BD~" <~...@nomail.afraid.org>
>
> Once again, proving your troll status.
>
> --
> Dave
> Multi-AV Scanning Tool -http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

What could a mild-mannered poster like you possibly do to piss off
this person?

Unless...unless you really are a B.S. artist.

RL

[VanguardLH]

David H. Lipman wrote:

> Once again, proving your troll status.

Sorry, Dave, he is correct about you spewing "STFU" at him. His
feelings are hurt. I normally don't see his posts because I've got him
killfiled but was experimenting with editing my rules just now and
sometimes he nymshifts again and I have to update. He nymshifts within
the very same thread all the time (I think I found around 10 nyms for
him so far for permutations between moniker and e-mail fields).

The evidence that BoaterDave was too ****ing lazy to produce is found
at:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...RMZeoBprgVqWS1
(short URL: http://************/2czwzsv)

Looking at the headers, it sure looks like you (with a slight difference
in the e-mail field in the From header but the other headers match with
your retort here). That Lipman "STFU" reply was:

- Path header shows it was submitted through newsguy.com - same NSP that
you used here in your reply in this thread. This cannot be modified
by imposter. The imposter would have to also use newsguy to submit
their posts so their injection point was the same as yours - and that
means YOU (if you claim that post isn't yours) should be contacting
newsguy to kill the imposter's account.

- From header is the same as your reply here both in syntax and values
for comment and email fields. Could be forged by an imposter.

- Organization header is the same. Imposter can also forge this.

- Message-ID shows post came from newsguy.com. This can be modified by
an imposter's NNTP client; however, in this case, it matches the
injection point listed in Path header.

- The NNTP-Posting-Host header is worthless. It points back to a host
owned by the newsguy.com service.

- If it was an imposter, they managed to get the same exact value for
the X-Newsreader header (both in client name and version).

- Looks like the X-Face header has the same value in that other post and
your reply here (although an imposter could include it).

So are you, the David Lipman here in this thread, claiming that you did
not submit the "STFU" reply over in the alt.privacy.spyware newsgroup?
From your reply here and the "STFU" post over in alt.privacy.spyware,
just what do you claim shows that the "STFU" post wasn't yours?

As to Boater Dave's claim that you can't be trusted, that's just him
pouting like the 4-year old that he is. He isn't mentally equipped to
handle insults (to ignore them or retort in kind) and you should already
know that and stop taunting him as it really doesn't reflect well on
your behavior, either. It really looks like BD suckered you into your
insulting reply; i.e., you fell for his tactic.

So if your reply here was to infer that you never did say STFU to
BoaterDave then you've been exposed as a liar. If you just wanted to
continue the insult thread from there to this thread here, looks like he
suckered you again.

[David H. Lipman]

From: "VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH>

| David H. Lipman wrote:

>> Once again, proving your troll status.

| Sorry, Dave, he is correct about you spewing "STFU" at him. His
| feelings are hurt. I normally don't see his posts because I've got him
| killfiled but was experimenting with editing my rules just now and
| sometimes he nymshifts again and I have to update. He nymshifts within
| the very same thread all the time (I think I found around 10 nyms for
| him so far for permutations between moniker and e-mail fields).

| The evidence that BoaterDave was too ****ing lazy to produce is found


| http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...?dmode=source&
| utoken=2DpdNDMAAADoDsZSpxZYjhIqH65tyeBjfwLAiZPBOfJ 5mS5yQ6t2yleICtYRRKRoCz7FQALxGtg-
| Vmkvn2RMZeoBprgVqWS1
| (short URL: http://************/2czwzsv)

| Looking at the headers, it sure looks like you (with a slight difference
| in the e-mail field in the From header but the other headers match with
| your retort here). That Lipman "STFU" reply was:

| - Path header shows it was submitted through newsguy.com - same NSP that
| you used here in your reply in this thread. This cannot be modified
| by imposter. The imposter would have to also use newsguy to submit
| their posts so their injection point was the same as yours - and that
| means YOU (if you claim that post isn't yours) should be contacting
| newsguy to kill the imposter's account.

| - From header is the same as your reply here both in syntax and values
| for comment and email fields. Could be forged by an imposter.

| - Organization header is the same. Imposter can also forge this.

| - Message-ID shows post came from newsguy.com. This can be modified by
| an imposter's NNTP client; however, in this case, it matches the
| injection point listed in Path header.

| - The NNTP-Posting-Host header is worthless. It points back to a host
| owned by the newsguy.com service.

| - If it was an imposter, they managed to get the same exact value for
| the X-Newsreader header (both in client name and version).

| - Looks like the X-Face header has the same value in that other post and
| your reply here (although an imposter could include it).

| So are you, the David Lipman here in this thread, claiming that you did
| not submit the "STFU" reply over in the alt.privacy.spyware newsgroup?
| From your reply here and the "STFU" post over in alt.privacy.spyware,
| just what do you claim shows that the "STFU" post wasn't yours?

| As to Boater Dave's claim that you can't be trusted, that's just him
| pouting like the 4-year old that he is. He isn't mentally equipped to
| handle insults (to ignore them or retort in kind) and you should already
| know that and stop taunting him as it really doesn't reflect well on
| your behavior, either. It really looks like BD suckered you into your
| insulting reply; i.e., you fell for his tactic.

| So if your reply here was to infer that you never did say STFU to
| BoaterDave then you've been exposed as a liar. If you just wanted to
| continue the insult thread from there to this thread here, looks like he
| suckered you again.

I never claimed I didn't write "STFU" to BD. You have over anyalized this.

I wrote "Once again, proving your troll status."
To the fact that he extracted the reply, conveniently snipping out "you are trolling" in
the full text reply... "STFU -- you are trolling and I'd trust Peter over YOU any day of
the week!"
But he took the misquoted text and then created a new subject x-posting the newly created
subject reply to other groups.

He was trolling in a.p.s and I called him out on it. BoaterDave is a bloody troll!


--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[StevieO]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:WMGdnVp5OJOP0UTRnZ2dnUVZ7vydnZ2d@bt.com...
> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>
>
>

I'm afraid that *I* have now lost all credibility !

I am *NOT* to be trusted - ever.