From: "siljaline" <spam@uce.gov>

| shplink wrote:
>> Hi there...

>> I've been updating and posting the FAQ to this fine newsgroup for a
>> number of years now.

>> I enjoy browsing through the discussions, particularly the less
>> inflammatory ones, when I have the time. But I find myself monitoring
>> this group less and less. I wonder if the time has come to pass the
>> torch, so to speak:

>> Is an FAQ even necessary, any more? Would anyone be willing to take over?

>> I'd appreciate any feedback... Thanks!

>> ~John K.

| John,

| I am remiss at my promises to provide you feedback to overhaul the FAQ.

| As far as someone else taking on what you have done very well for a good number
| of years, I do not know what to tell you.

| I would say this, based on the signal to noise ratio of this NG, I am not sure if it
| needs
| an FAQ any longer.

| At last revision it took longer in debate as to what should be in the FAQ than it did
| getting
| a reasonably good FAQ put together - which begs the question.
| If one was to do and FAQ from scratch, who, by definition would be able to sign off on
| it ?

| I think those that have a legitimate interest in reading this group are sufficiently
| familiar with
| whatever information required is out there on search engines.

| If all else fails, ask.

| Thanks for your efforts in maintaining the FAQ for as many years as it has been !!!
| _My Hat off to you_


I disagree.
Because of the S/N ratio, I think a FAQ is more important than ever.

John:

You have done a great job. T H A N K Y O U !

--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp