Re: Concerned about Privacy?

[Dustin]

ASCII <me2@privacy.net> wrote in news:4cbb577d.12224562@EDCBIC:

> Just how much do they know
> when you click on their site?
> https://panopticlick.eff.org/

Evidently, out of the 1.2million or so visitors so far; I'm unique (no
real surprise, tiny sample base)20.22 bits of information.... I took a
look at the results, so I guess i'm the only one who hasn't skinned
firefox or has only the essential plugins. <G>

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10)
Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Browser Characteristic bits of identifying information one in x
browsers have this value value
User Agent
11.42

2732.38

And most of my score is made from that bit of information alone. I
guess nobody uses windows xp with firefox? If you believe that, I have
a huge ass water tressel in storage on a lake in arizona going cheap.

Oh, my browser plugin details finished me off. Folks, I've got
noscript, java, and the necessary BS to view multimedia sites. And
adobe's nonsense, thats it; nothing fancy. Plain jane essentially here.
Unique my arse.




--
Some people are like a Slinky. Not much good for anything, but you
can't help but smile when one tumbles down the stairs.

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ASCII<me2@privacy.net> wrote in news:4cbb577d.12224562@EDCBIC:
>
>> Just how much do they know
>> when you click on their site?
>> https://panopticlick.eff.org/
>
> Evidently, out of the 1.2million or so visitors so far; I'm unique (no
> real surprise, tiny sample base)20.22 bits of information.... I took a
> look at the results, so I guess i'm the only one who hasn't skinned
> firefox or has only the essential plugins.<G>
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10)
> Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>
> Browser Characteristic bits of identifying information one in x
> browsers have this value value
> User Agent
> 11.42
>
> 2732.38
>
> And most of my score is made from that bit of information alone. I
> guess nobody uses windows xp with firefox? If you believe that, I have
> a huge ass water tressel in storage on a lake in arizona going cheap.
>
> Oh, my browser plugin details finished me off. Folks, I've got
> noscript, java, and the necessary BS to view multimedia sites. And
> adobe's nonsense, thats it; nothing fancy. Plain jane essentially here.
> Unique my arse.
>

Did you read here, Dustin?

https://panopticlick.eff.org/faq.php

[Dustin]

ASCII <me2@privacy.net> wrote in news:4cc30b09.11860406@EDCBIC:

> Dustin wrote:
>>Unique my arse.
>
> Here's unique as well:
> http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7...nopticlick.jpg
> Maybe [F-11] for a full screen depiction might help?
>

LOL. I've got the ability to modify the http headers as well. Could have
alot of fun with that site actually...


--
Some people are like a Slinky. Not much good for anything, but you can't
help but smile when one tumbles down the stairs.

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:IuqdnQ3vOYciY1_RnZ2dnUVZ8n2dnZ2d@bt.com:

> Dustin wrote:
>> ASCII<me2@privacy.net> wrote in news:4cbb577d.12224562@EDCBIC:
>>
>>> Just how much do they know
>>> when you click on their site?
>>> https://panopticlick.eff.org/
>>
>> Evidently, out of the 1.2million or so visitors so far; I'm unique
>> (no real surprise, tiny sample base)20.22 bits of information.... I
>> took a look at the results, so I guess i'm the only one who hasn't
>> skinned firefox or has only the essential plugins.<G>
>>
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10)
>> Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>>
>> Browser Characteristic bits of identifying information
>> one in x browsers have this value value
>> User Agent
>> 11.42
>>
>> 2732.38
>>
>> And most of my score is made from that bit of information alone. I
>> guess nobody uses windows xp with firefox? If you believe that, I
>> have a huge ass water tressel in storage on a lake in arizona going
>> cheap.
>>
>> Oh, my browser plugin details finished me off. Folks, I've got
>> noscript, java, and the necessary BS to view multimedia sites. And
>> adobe's nonsense, thats it; nothing fancy. Plain jane essentially
>> here. Unique my arse.
>>
>
> Did you read here, Dustin?
>
> https://panopticlick.eff.org/faq.php

Yes, smartass, I did. Listen, Your basically a bafoon for all intents
and purposes here; please stop trying to talk down to me. It's old,
unwarranted and i'm just going to 0wn you for trying.


--
Some people are like a Slinky. Not much good for anything, but you
can't help but smile when one tumbles down the stairs.