User2User - question with no answer given.

[~BD~]

On 14/01/2010 01:31, LovelyLady wrote:

>> "Grybeard" <grybear...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:jde5l0GTGHA.4276@GAMERA.annex.com...
>
>> *Reckon he finally figured it out?*
>
>
> From what I have read on the Microsoft newsgroups, I believe that you
> also frequent User2User at Annexcafe.com Mr Foldes.
>
> No doubt you recall 'Grybeard' mentioning this query, but I wonder if
> you know *exactly* what BoaterDave discovered there.
>
> Is it a safe place for others to go to get help with their computers?


So - is it?

[Li]

<SIGH>

"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:nbGdnbHLUduhZuDRnZ2dnUVZ8hOdnZ2d@bt.com...
> On 14/01/2010 01:31, LovelyLady wrote:
>
>>> "Grybeard" <grybear...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:jde5l0GTGHA.4276@GAMERA.annex.com...
>>
>>> *Reckon he finally figured it out?*

Have you figured it out yet, that you are NOT wanted on AnnexCafe?


>> Is it a safe place for others to go to get help with their computers?

Never for you, Admiral.

[Bullwinkle]

No one, not even you kids, want you around.


"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:nbGdnbHLUduhZuDRnZ2dnUVZ8hOdnZ2d@bt.com...
On 14/01/2010 01:31, LovelyLady wrote:

>> "Grybeard" <grybear...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:jde5l0GTGHA.4276@GAMERA.annex.com...
>
>> *Reckon he finally figured it out?*
>
>
> From what I have read on the Microsoft newsgroups, I believe that you
> also frequent User2User at Annexcafe.com Mr Foldes.
>
> No doubt you recall 'Grybeard' mentioning this query, but I wonder if
> you know *exactly* what BoaterDave discovered there.
>
> Is it a safe place for others to go to get help with their computers?


So - is it?

[~BD~]

On 01/09/2010 10:02, Li wrote a message *very* early in the morning!

> <SIGH>
>
> "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:nbGdnbHLUduhZuDRnZ2dnUVZ8hOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>> On 14/01/2010 01:31, LovelyLady wrote:
>>
>>>> "Grybeard" <grybear...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:jde5l0GTGHA.4276@GAMERA.annex.com...
>>>
>>>> *Reckon he finally figured it out?*
>
> Have you figured it out yet, that you are NOT wanted on AnnexCafe?

Oh yes - I realise that!

It's not a case of "I want to be allowed to post on Annexcafe" - more a
question of *why* did some folk there not want to answer my searching
questions? (no, I don't mean detailed personal information. In the main,
questions concerning malware!)

The last time I looked the UK U2U group appeared dead and almost unused.
Why is that, Li? Why keep /that/ group yet close Scorched-Earth and
MainStreet?

>>> Is it a safe place for others to go to get help with their computers?
>
> Never for you, Admiral.

Avoidance!

Has anyone from alt.privacy.spyware *ever* gone there for hep/advice?

Maybe they are more wary than me and will not be too happy to connect
their computer to a private server.

Doing so would breach a firewall - wouldn't it?

--
Dave

[Li]

"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:rJmdnZ0aQ9RQt-PRnZ2dnUVZ7vudnZ2d@bt.com...
> On 01/09/2010 10:02, Li wrote a message *very* early in the morning!

And your point?

>
>> <SIGH>
>>
>> "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:nbGdnbHLUduhZuDRnZ2dnUVZ8hOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> On 14/01/2010 01:31, LovelyLady wrote:
>>>
>>>>> "Grybeard" <grybear...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:jde5l0GTGHA.4276@GAMERA.annex.com...
>>>>
>>>>> *Reckon he finally figured it out?*
>>
>> Have you figured it out yet, that you are NOT wanted on AnnexCafe?
>
> Oh yes - I realise that!
>
> It's not a case of "I want to be allowed to post on Annexcafe" - more a
> question of *why* did some folk there not want to answer my searching
> questions? (no, I don't mean detailed personal information. In the main,
> questions concerning malware!)

Wrong. You accused long standing Members of being terrorists and demanded
personal information to prove they were not.

>
> The last time I looked the UK U2U group appeared dead and almost unused.
> Why is that, Li? Why keep /that/ group yet close Scorched-Earth and
> MainStreet?

None of your business. Why did Anne & eventually Andrew abandon you? Did you
post personal information to Usenet from their emails?


>
>>>> Is it a safe place for others to go to get help with their computers?
>>
>> Never for you, Admiral.
>
> Avoidance!
>
> Has anyone from alt.privacy.spyware *ever* gone there for hep/advice?

Maybe. Who knows what nyms folks choose to use? Who cares?

>
> Maybe they are more wary than me and will not be too happy to connect
> their computer to a private server.
>
> Doing so would breach a firewall - wouldn't it?

Would it?

[FromTheRafters]

"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:rJmdnZ0aQ9RQt-PRnZ2dnUVZ7vudnZ2d@bt.com...
> On 01/09/2010 10:02, Li wrote a message *very* early in the morning!
>
>> <SIGH>
>>
>> "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:nbGdnbHLUduhZuDRnZ2dnUVZ8hOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> On 14/01/2010 01:31, LovelyLady wrote:
>>>
>>>>> "Grybeard" <grybear...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:jde5l0GTGHA.4276@GAMERA.annex.com...
>>>>
>>>>> *Reckon he finally figured it out?*
>>
>> Have you figured it out yet, that you are NOT wanted on AnnexCafe?
>
> Oh yes - I realise that!
>
> It's not a case of "I want to be allowed to post on Annexcafe" - more
> a question of *why* did some folk there not want to answer my
> searching questions? (no, I don't mean detailed personal information.
> In the main, questions concerning malware!)
>
> The last time I looked the UK U2U group appeared dead and almost
> unused. Why is that, Li? Why keep /that/ group yet close
> Scorched-Earth and MainStreet?
>
>>>> Is it a safe place for others to go to get help with their
>>>> computers?
>>
>> Never for you, Admiral.
>
> Avoidance!
>
> Has anyone from alt.privacy.spyware *ever* gone there for hep/advice?
>
> Maybe they are more wary than me and will not be too happy to connect
> their computer to a private server.
>
> Doing so would breach a firewall - wouldn't it?

Define "breach".

....one of my pet peeves since Katrina caused levees to "fail" *after*
having been breached. The terminology was causing real problems (as was
the term "refugees" which doesn't mean what those afflicted thought it
meant)

I tend to think of 'breach of purpose' - and the purpose of a firewall
is *not* to protect you from things that you invite in. In a dam for
instance - if the purpose is to regulate a certain amount of water
(flood control dam), and the water exceeds that amount and goes down the
spillway, it is breached (no longer able to regulate) but has not failed
because the water is now out-of specs. The spillways are there so that a
breach does not result in failure and the release of the water it was
storing.

[~BD~]

On 01/09/2010 14:28, FromTheRafters wrote:

> Define "breach".
>
> ...one of my pet peeves since Katrina caused levees to "fail" *after*
> having been breached. The terminology was causing real problems (as was
> the term "refugees" which doesn't mean what those afflicted thought it
> meant)

Best choose your own FTR http://www.thefreedictionary.com/breach

> I tend to think of 'breach of purpose'

I think along the lines of:- a. An opening, a tear, or a rupture.

> and the purpose of a firewall is *not* to protect you from things that you invite in.

So if I 'invite' a connection from a private server you feel there is no
'breach' per se? I'm sure that's correct and I do not disagree.

However, is one's PC then more vulnerable to an attack from that private
server as compared to simply visiting any URL with a browser?

I've been wondering about that for a very long time!

Your thoughts welcomed.

[Peter Foldes]

Li.

He is just going to go on and on. Leave this idiot alone from this Annex subject. I
am taking care of this idiot Troll who deserves everything that comes his way
shortly. Thanks Li

BTW:Watch his croosposting. Remove and if needed post to the SE group on Eternal
September .
--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

"Li" <li@invalid.spam.com> wrote in message
news:4uCdnY4k1Jmp1ePRnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@ohio.net...
>
>
> "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:rJmdnZ0aQ9RQt-PRnZ2dnUVZ7vudnZ2d@bt.com...
>> On 01/09/2010 10:02, Li wrote a message *very* early in the morning!
>
> And your point?
>
>>
>>> <SIGH>
>>>
>>> "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:nbGdnbHLUduhZuDRnZ2dnUVZ8hOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>> On 14/01/2010 01:31, LovelyLady wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> "Grybeard" <grybear...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:jde5l0GTGHA.4276@GAMERA.annex.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> *Reckon he finally figured it out?*
>>>
>>> Have you figured it out yet, that you are NOT wanted on AnnexCafe?
>>
>> Oh yes - I realise that!
>>
>> It's not a case of "I want to be allowed to post on Annexcafe" - more a question
>> of *why* did some folk there not want to answer my searching questions? (no, I
>> don't mean detailed personal information. In the main, questions concerning
>> malware!)
>
> Wrong. You accused long standing Members of being terrorists and demanded personal
> information to prove they were not.
>
>>
>> The last time I looked the UK U2U group appeared dead and almost unused. Why is
>> that, Li? Why keep /that/ group yet close Scorched-Earth and MainStreet?
>
> None of your business. Why did Anne & eventually Andrew abandon you? Did you post
> personal information to Usenet from their emails?
>
>
>>
>>>>> Is it a safe place for others to go to get help with their computers?
>>>
>>> Never for you, Admiral.
>>
>> Avoidance!
>>
>> Has anyone from alt.privacy.spyware *ever* gone there for hep/advice?
>
> Maybe. Who knows what nyms folks choose to use? Who cares?
>
>>
>> Maybe they are more wary than me and will not be too happy to connect their
>> computer to a private server.
>>
>> Doing so would breach a firewall - wouldn't it?
>
> Would it?
>
>
>

[~BD~]

On 01/09/2010 16:26, Peter Foldes wrote:
> Li.
>
> I am taking care of this idiot Troll who deserves everything
> that comes his way shortly.

Ah! Yet *another* message to be printed and held on your 'threat' file.

You really shouldn't put such things in writing! ;-)

[Dustin]

~BD~ <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
news:gJednfqPu7nL6OPRnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@bt.com:

> On 01/09/2010 16:26, Peter Foldes wrote:
>> Li.
> >
>> I am taking care of this idiot Troll who deserves everything
>> that comes his way shortly.
>
> Ah! Yet *another* message to be printed and held on your 'threat' file.
>
> You really shouldn't put such things in writing! ;-)

BD,

When is the best time of year to visit your locale? I'm not much into
real snowy/coldarse damp weather.


--
"I like your Christ. I don't like your Christians. They are so unlike
your Christ." - author unknown.