Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

  1. #1
    Nomen Nescio Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010


    "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:xZednYsxE_L83-bRnZ2dnUVZ7vCdnZ2d@bt.com...
    > FromTheRafters wrote:
    >
    >>> It doesn't seem to work on my OS X machine!

    >>
    >> Why would it?
    >>
    >> Check out the system requirements - OS-X does *not* meet the
    >> requirements.

    >
    > I've never done a WHOOOOOOOSHHHHHHHHH before! ;-)
    >
    > It's not a case of "it doesn't work" - it isn't *necessary* on a Mac!
    > You, of all people, should know that!


    I used to think you made such stupid statements because you
    were intellectually challenged.

    Now I realise you're just another gormless ****wit who loves
    to see his name online.

    STFU and FOAD you idiot.




  2. #2
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    Nomen Nescio wrote:
    > "~BD~"<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:xZednYsxE_L83-bRnZ2dnUVZ7vCdnZ2d@bt.com...
    >> FromTheRafters wrote:
    >>
    >>>> It doesn't seem to work on my OS X machine!
    >>>
    >>> Why would it?
    >>>
    >>> Check out the system requirements - OS-X does *not* meet the
    >>> requirements.

    >>
    >> I've never done a WHOOOOOOOSHHHHHHHHH before! ;-)
    >>
    >> It's not a case of "it doesn't work" - it isn't *necessary* on a Mac!
    >> You, of all people, should know that!

    >
    > I used to think you made such stupid statements because you
    > were intellectually challenged.



    Perhaps, instead of a flippant answer, you could have referred me to
    MacScan, details of which may be found here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacScan (Folk may not realise the need!)

    Now I realise that *you're* just another gormless ****wit who loves
    to see *his* name online.

    > STFU and FOAD


    Before I do that, tell me what this means, decoded:-

    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
    Version: N/A

    jA0EAwMC6q1V62+mUG1gyaiTQGmGvhZCQn7KYC0zQQUeH7tchR SjSA6oej3QWg68
    6MYD1NUwa8YoAuY9wNpCnwj4LJJS14NzpMxMQHpp4tuZuwf4/8PLi8NfdK9AQwfG
    NMlJigmhnI8D9pShqNOmj8S+5TM4Qwp6Og7a9oAE7PyXusii8J k1q32rw2N/vlSL
    rMa9EPqwhWJTTNWYUMamC/idfnI90GaM6pNnQtDl/4r+qD05EFWFIIk=
    =y4Y6
    -----END PGP MESSAGE-----


    Then explain why *anyone* has a need to use such encryption on Usenet
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy


    My WAG is that they are up to no good! ;-)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •