JD wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> You are a forger and an idiot. Why all the crossposts? Crossposting
>> removed
>
> Kill file the ignorant s-o-b and be done with him although you'll have
> to keep adding him to the file since he changes his address all the
> time.
Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.
On 30/08/2010 13:06, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
> Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.
>
Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.
Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation instead
of always being antagonistic.
Your turn.
~BD~ wrote:
> On 30/08/2010 13:06, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.
>
> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.
Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group alone
finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
From: ~BD~ <~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
From: ~BD~ <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
From: ~BD~ <Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
"in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
> Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
> post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation
> instead of always being antagonistic.
Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to antagonize
just about everyone you reply to.
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
On 30/08/2010 15:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.
>
> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group alone
> finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>
> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
I do! Indeed, I think it was you who explained it. You must admit
though, bts, I've not in any way tried to /obscure/ my identity, like
some folk posting here.
>> Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
>> post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation
>> instead of always being antagonistic.
>
> Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to antagonize
> just about everyone you reply to.
That is very unfair and not entirely true.
With the exception of the posting entity, Peter Foldes (a really nasty
piece of work - using his own words).
Maybe it's simply a matter of interpretation of comments made;
kill-filing someone solves nothing at all. If folk cannot conduct a
civil dialogue, even if a point of view is diametrically opposed, then
maybe they shouldn't be using Usenet groups at all.
BD
~BD~ wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or
>>> another.
>>
>> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group
>> alone finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>>
>> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
>
> I do! Indeed, I think it was you who explained it. You must admit
> though, bts, I've not in any way tried to /obscure/ my identity, like
> some folk posting here.
That's not the point. You keep morphing to escape killfiles. And *that*
is annoying to just about anyone who doesn't want to read your inane
paranoia posts, your stupid cross-posting, nor any of the rest of the
drivel you come up with, which is nearly always antagonistic.
>>> Maybe there would be <snip unattributed quote>
>>
>> Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to
>> antagonize just about everyone you reply to.
>
> That is very unfair and not entirely true.
It is neither of those.
> With the exception of the posting entity, Peter Foldes (a really
> nasty piece of work - using his own words).
Nobody cares about your and your Peter Foldes war. If you ignored him
and stopped replying to him, he would probably disappear.
> Maybe it's simply a matter of interpretation of comments made;
> kill-filing someone solves nothing at all. If folk cannot conduct a
> civil dialogue, even if a point of view is diametrically opposed,
Killfiling you is a more-than-adequate solution for a lot of people, yet
you go out of your way to make that nigh onto impossible for them.
> then maybe they shouldn't be using Usenet groups at all.
Usenet has been around a lot longer than you have .. but you are doing
your damnest to ruin it.
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You are correct on all points. As long as he keeps Trolling me I will respond to
this moron(He will not stop guaranteed)
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:i5gl0v$sqr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
~BD~ wrote:
> On 30/08/2010 15:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or
>>> another.
>>
>> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group
>> alone finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>>
>> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
>
> I do! Indeed, I think it was you who explained it. You must admit
> though, bts, I've not in any way tried to /obscure/ my identity, like
> some folk posting here.
Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have one's
account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the former, but it
is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond to such complaints
quickly and with definitive action.
So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about netcopping a
pissant like you.
On 31/08/2010 02:12, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have one's
> account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the former, but it
> is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond to such complaints
> quickly and with definitive action.
> So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about netcopping a
> pissant like you.
Don't threaten. Either do it, or don't!
The alternative, of course, is for you to engage in conversation.
Try it - you might just enjoy it! ;-)
~BD~ wrote:
> On 31/08/2010 02:12, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
>> Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have one's
>> account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the
>> former, but it is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond
>> to such complaints quickly and with definitive action.
>
>> So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about
>> netcopping a pissant like you.
>
> Don't threaten. Either do it, or don't!
Everyone gets a warning. This was yours.
> The alternative, of course, is for you to engage in conversation.
> Try it - you might just enjoy it! ;-)
With a sophist troll? Hardly.
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> On 30/08/2010 13:06, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>> Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.
>>
>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.
>
> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group alone
> finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>
> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
>
>> Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
>> post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation
>> instead of always being antagonistic.
>
> Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to antagonize
> just about everyone you reply to.
>
Killfile works for me. He can only vary his name so many ways and each
time he does it gets added to my killfile.
--
JD..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote