Another threat from a distraught PF?

[~BD~]

On 29/08/2010 19:05, Peter Foldes wrote:
> David Brooks is a liar and ****ing Troll. You are a piece of **** and
> you stink accordingly. You have no dead son and **** the sympathy for
> you on this matter. Rot in hell and may everyday bring **** down on you.
> You are a sorry excuse for a human being and one deranged idiot at that.
> Go and stick a human rod in your mouth and pretend that it is a popsicle
> and have at it. You are a toothless wonder and hope your dentures fall
> into the sewer. You are an ******* and on top of it you are a Troll .
> In other words David. **** You.
>
> I am coming back again soon and then we will talk.
>
> Now how is that grab you. I think it was very poetic. :-)


I don't think he likes me very much!

At least he's showing his true colours at last. Progress!

--
Dave - I do so wish he wouldn't use foul language.

[Aardvark]

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:05:48 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> I do so wish he wouldn't use foul language.

****! What's wrong with that?

What's with all the X-posting, BTW?

--
"When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle.
Then I realised God doesn’t work that way, so I stole one and
prayed for forgiveness." - Emo Phillips

[~BD~]

On 29/08/2010 21:21, Aardvark wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:05:48 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> I do so wish he wouldn't use foul language.
>
> ****! What's wrong with that?

It's un ..... officer-like! ;-)

> What's with all the X-posting, BTW?

I'm simply exercising my freedom to bring the antics of PF to a wider
audience. He is someone who simply cannot be trusted to tell the truth
and I feel that others are entitled to be made aware of that fact.

Whilst I could write a ditty to every single group (there's more than
110,000 on my Giganews/BT server) I decided to limit it to just one
additional group outside SE. That's being *very* conservative!

You may have noticed (but why should you?) that hardly *anyone* posts to
the microsoft.public.test.here newsgroup. It's always been like that.
One might have surmised that it would have been a highly popular 'test'
site - being Microsoft's - but not so! Strange ;-)

[Peter Foldes]

You are a forger and an idiot. Why all the crossposts? Crossposting removed

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

"~BD~" <~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:RrKdnTQfwdCoWufRnZ2dnUVZ8gudnZ2d@bt.com...
> On 29/08/2010 21:21, Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:05:48 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> I do so wish he wouldn't use foul language.
>>
>> ****! What's wrong with that?
>
> It's un ..... officer-like! ;-)
>
>> What's with all the X-posting, BTW?
>
> I'm simply exercising my freedom to bring the antics of PF to a wider audience. He
> is someone who simply cannot be trusted to tell the truth and I feel that others
> are entitled to be made aware of that fact.
>
> Whilst I could write a ditty to every single group (there's more than 110,000 on
> my Giganews/BT server) I decided to limit it to just one additional group outside
> SE. That's being *very* conservative!
>
> You may have noticed (but why should you?) that hardly *anyone* posts to the
> microsoft.public.test.here newsgroup. It's always been like that.
> One might have surmised that it would have been a highly popular 'test' site -
> being Microsoft's - but not so! Strange ;-)
>
>

[JD]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> You are a forger and an idiot. Why all the crossposts? Crossposting removed
>

Kill file the ignorant s-o-b and be done with him although you'll have
to keep adding him to the file since he changes his address all the time.


--
JD..

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

JD wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> You are a forger and an idiot. Why all the crossposts? Crossposting
>> removed
>
> Kill file the ignorant s-o-b and be done with him although you'll have
> to keep adding him to the file since he changes his address all the
> time.

Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.

[~BD~]

On 30/08/2010 13:06, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
> Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.
>

Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.

Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation instead
of always being antagonistic.

Your turn.

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

~BD~ wrote:

> On 30/08/2010 13:06, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.
>
> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.

Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group alone
finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:

From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
From: ~BD~ <~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
From: ~BD~ <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
From: ~BD~ <Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>

"in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.

> Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
> post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation
> instead of always being antagonistic.

Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to antagonize
just about everyone you reply to.

--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul

[~BD~]

On 30/08/2010 15:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:

>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.
>
> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group alone
> finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>
> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.

I do! Indeed, I think it was you who explained it. You must admit
though, bts, I've not in any way tried to /obscure/ my identity, like
some folk posting here.

>> Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
>> post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation
>> instead of always being antagonistic.
>
> Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to antagonize
> just about everyone you reply to.

That is very unfair and not entirely true.

With the exception of the posting entity, Peter Foldes (a really nasty
piece of work - using his own words).

Maybe it's simply a matter of interpretation of comments made;
kill-filing someone solves nothing at all. If folk cannot conduct a
civil dialogue, even if a point of view is diametrically opposed, then
maybe they shouldn't be using Usenet groups at all.


BD

[JD]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> On 30/08/2010 13:06, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>> Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.
>>
>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.
>
> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group alone
> finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>
> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
>
>> Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
>> post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation
>> instead of always being antagonistic.
>
> Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to antagonize
> just about everyone you reply to.
>

Killfile works for me. He can only vary his name so many ways and each
time he does it gets added to my killfile.

--
JD..