Another threat from a distraught PF?

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

~BD~ wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or
>>> another.
>>
>> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group
>> alone finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>>
>> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
>
> I do! Indeed, I think it was you who explained it. You must admit
> though, bts, I've not in any way tried to /obscure/ my identity, like
> some folk posting here.

That's not the point. You keep morphing to escape killfiles. And *that*
is annoying to just about anyone who doesn't want to read your inane
paranoia posts, your stupid cross-posting, nor any of the rest of the
drivel you come up with, which is nearly always antagonistic.

>>> Maybe there would be <snip unattributed quote>
>>
>> Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to
>> antagonize just about everyone you reply to.
>
> That is very unfair and not entirely true.

It is neither of those.

> With the exception of the posting entity, Peter Foldes (a really
> nasty piece of work - using his own words).

Nobody cares about your and your Peter Foldes war. If you ignored him
and stopped replying to him, he would probably disappear.

> Maybe it's simply a matter of interpretation of comments made;
> kill-filing someone solves nothing at all. If folk cannot conduct a
> civil dialogue, even if a point of view is diametrically opposed,

Killfiling you is a more-than-adequate solution for a lot of people, yet
you go out of your way to make that nigh onto impossible for them.

> then maybe they shouldn't be using Usenet groups at all.

Usenet has been around a lot longer than you have .. but you are doing
your damnest to ruin it.

--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul

[Peter Foldes]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

You are correct on all points. As long as he keeps Trolling me I will respond to
this moron(He will not stop guaranteed)

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:i5gl0v$sqr$1@news.eternal-september.org...

[Leythos]

In article <ROWdnRGk4KsBIOfRnZ2dnUVZ8kudnZ2d@bt.com>,
~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk says...
>

Please stop changing your identity - I have you Kill Filed and get tired
of constantly adding your new identities to the list.


--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid>

| ~BD~ wrote:

>> On 30/08/2010 13:06, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>> Morphing to evade killfiles is probably a violation of his TOS.

>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or another.

| Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group alone
| finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:

| From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
| From: ~BD~ <~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
| From: ~BD~ <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
| From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
| From: ~BD~ <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
| From: ~BD~ <Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>

| "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.

>> Maybe there would be far less hassle if folk like you either made no
>> post in response *or*, preferably, engaged in civil conversation
>> instead of always being antagonistic.

| Maybe there would be far less hassle if *you* didn't seek to antagonize
| just about everyone you reply to.

Spot on BTS - Spot on!

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

~BD~ wrote:
> On 30/08/2010 15:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>> Morphing? I've *always* posted as BoaterDave in one guise or
>>> another.
>>
>> Yes, morphing. A quick glance through the last month in this group
>> alone finds at least the following MORPHS that you have used:
>>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>> From: ~BD~<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk>
>> From: ~BD~<Boater.Dave@hotmail.co.uk.>
>>
>> "in one guise or another" is morphing. But you know that of course.
>
> I do! Indeed, I think it was you who explained it. You must admit
> though, bts, I've not in any way tried to /obscure/ my identity, like
> some folk posting here.

Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have one's
account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the former, but it
is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond to such complaints
quickly and with definitive action.

So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about netcopping a
pissant like you.

[~BD~]

On 31/08/2010 02:12, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:

> Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have one's
> account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the former, but it
> is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond to such complaints
> quickly and with definitive action.

> So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about netcopping a
> pissant like you.

Don't threaten. Either do it, or don't!

The alternative, of course, is for you to engage in conversation.

Try it - you might just enjoy it! ;-)

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

~BD~ wrote:
> On 31/08/2010 02:12, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
>> Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have one's
>> account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the
>> former, but it is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond
>> to such complaints quickly and with definitive action.
>
>> So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about
>> netcopping a pissant like you.
>
> Don't threaten. Either do it, or don't!

Everyone gets a warning. This was yours.

> The alternative, of course, is for you to engage in conversation.

> Try it - you might just enjoy it! ;-)

With a sophist troll? Hardly.

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net>

| ~BD~ wrote:
>> On 31/08/2010 02:12, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:

>>> Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have one's
>>> account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the
>>> former, but it is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond
>>> to such complaints quickly and with definitive action.

>>> So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about
>>> netcopping a pissant like you.

>> Don't threaten. Either do it, or don't!

| Everyone gets a warning. This was yours.

>> The alternative, of course, is for you to engage in conversation.

>> Try it - you might just enjoy it! ;-)

| With a sophist troll? Hardly.


Passive aggressive

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net>
>
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> On 31/08/2010 02:12, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
>>>> Obscuring one's identity is neither net abuse nor cause to have
>>>> one's account cancelled. Morphing to evade killfiles may not be the
>>>> former, but it is certainly the latter--most nntp providers respond
>>>> to such complaints quickly and with definitive action.
>
>>>> So stop morphing, because I have absolutely no qualms about
>>>> netcopping a pissant like you.
>
>>> Don't threaten. Either do it, or don't!
>
>> Everyone gets a warning. This was yours.
>
>>> The alternative, of course, is for you to engage in conversation.
>
>>> Try it - you might just enjoy it! ;-)
>
>> With a sophist troll? Hardly.
>
>
> Passive aggressive

You ain't just whistlin' Dixie.

[~BD~]

Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> Don't threaten. Either do it, or don't!
>
> Everyone gets a warning. This was yours.
>
>> The alternative, of course, is for you to engage in conversation.
>
>> Try it - you might just enjoy it! ;-)
>
> With a sophist troll? Hardly.
>


*This is why I care*!


BBC News!

MI5 head warns of serious risk of UK terrorist attack
************************************************** ***

The UK faces a continuing serious risk of a lethal terrorist attack
taking place, the head of MI5 has warned.

Jonathan Evans raised concerns over the number of soon-to-be-freed
inmates who are "committed extremists and likely to return to terrorist
activities".

He also said Somalia and Yemen were important concerns for MI5, as a
source of serious plots against the UK.

And, he said, the security service had not expected dissident
republicanism to grow as it had in Northern Ireland.

Mr Evans, who made the rare public remarks to the Worshipful Company of
Security Professionals in London, said dealing with international
terrorism remained the main focus of MI5's efforts.

'Diversifying threat'
*********************

"Counter-terrorist capabilities have improved in recent years but there
remains a serious risk of a lethal attack taking place. I see no reason
to believe that the position will significantly improve in the immediate
future," he said.

He said hundreds of officers were involved in an "intense struggle",
largely out of sight of the public.

Every month, hundreds of new leads come into MI5 headquarters at Thames
House from various sources, with only sufficient resources to
investigate those that appeared to be high priority, Mr Evans said.

"At any one time we have a handful of investigations that we believe
involve the real possibility of a terrorist attack being planned against
the UK," he said.

One concern is that a number of individuals, convicted of offences in
the years after the 9/11 attacks, are now coming out of prison having
served their terms.

"We know that some of these prisoners are still committed extremists who
are likely to return to their terrorist activities," Mr Evans said,
adding that they would be added to the cases that needed to be monitored.

He said another change in recent years was the source of the most
serious plots.

In previous years, officials have said that 75% of priority plots had
links to Pakistan. That figure has now dropped to 50%.

This was partly because of pressure on al-Qaeda leadership operating in
Pakistan's tribal areas, but it was also a sign of a diversifying
threat, he said.

Mr Evans said in Somalia there were a "significant number of UK
residents training in Al Shabaab camps" to fight in the country.

"I am concerned that it is only a matter of time before we see terrorism
on our streets inspired by those who are today fighting alongside Al
Shabaab," he warned.

Ref: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11335412

--
Dave - I'll wager that Cybercrime *is* funding training too!