Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

  1. #11
    Han Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    "siljaline" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in
    news:i5e6s4$ap9$1@news.eternal-september.org:

    > Han wrote:
    >> Sorry Silj, site isn't answering (but no 404 either)

    >
    > Can you download from any of the three sites, Han ?
    >
    > I have not issues here, as such, that is why I was able to provide the
    > direct download link.
    >
    > If the below link doesn't work there are some issues on the subject
    > machine.
    > (http://download.cnet.com/SpywareBlas...6637.html?part
    > =dl-SpywareBl&subj=dl&tag=button)
    >
    > Run MBAM from a flash drive, re-set the DNS, etc -
    >
    > Good luck !
    >
    > Silj


    It worked through the 3rd of the links here:
    <http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/sbdownload_free.html>,
    "Download SpywareBlaster 4.3 through the Coral distribution Network"


    --
    Best regards
    Han
    email address is invalid

  2. #12
    StevieO Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    Go ask them.

    Oh wait, you have been banned!

    LMAO!

    Go Fish.



    "~BD~" <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:ZLadne9deplzBOfRnZ2dnUVZ8nqdnZ2d@bt.com...

    It doesn't seem to work on my OS X machine!

    Is this a problem with which the guru's on Aumha might help?


  3. #13
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    On 29/08/2010 21:19, Aardvark wrote:

    > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:10:12 -0400, *Peter Foldes wrote*:
    >
    >> Spyblaster works on IE and Firefox and is not dependant of the OS as was
    >> told to you 100 times before.

    >
    > Would it work on *my* OS, ****wit? I'd like to know, just to keep my box
    > safe.


    Mr Foldes appears to have become *very* confused of late, as you have
    witnessed from this particular post to which you are responding,
    Aardvark. Even his spelling has deteriorated.

    I think it important that others are made aware of the errors he is
    making, so my cross-post has been restored.



  4. #14
    siljaline Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    FredW wrote:
    <snip>

    > I never had (and have) any problems with downloading from MajorGeeks.
    > I am used to check several times per day at MajorGeeks to see what new
    > versions of software have become available.
    > Sometimes software it is even much easier (and/or faster) to download
    > from MG, than from the originating site.


    I was not contesting the availability of downloads and speed from the MG site, Fred.
    The third-party ads are an annoyance, is all - blocked by my Hosts file but not for
    many.

    *Peace*

    Silj


    --
    "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
    because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
    -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
    - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_


  5. #15
    siljaline Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    Autumn wrote:
    > Thanks, Silj.


    Most welcome, as always, Autumn !

    Silj


    --
    "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
    because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
    -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
    - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_


  6. #16
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    You crossposting Troll. Crosspost removed

    --
    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect

    "~BD~" <~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:UtednaWWmIlTXufRnZ2dnUVZ8gydnZ2d@bt.com...
    > On 29/08/2010 21:19, Aardvark wrote:
    >
    >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:10:12 -0400, *Peter Foldes wrote*:
    >>
    >>> Spyblaster works on IE and Firefox and is not dependant of the OS as was
    >>> told to you 100 times before.

    >>
    >> Would it work on *my* OS, ****wit? I'd like to know, just to keep my box
    >> safe.

    >
    > Mr Foldes appears to have become *very* confused of late, as you have witnessed
    > from this particular post to which you are responding, Aardvark. Even his spelling
    > has deteriorated.
    >
    > I think it important that others are made aware of the errors he is making, so my
    > cross-post has been restored.
    >
    >



  7. #17
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    Extensive crossposting for no reason is removed.

    DO NOT CROSSPOST

    --
    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    http://www.microsoft.com/protect

    "~BD~" <~BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:UtednaWWmIlTXufRnZ2dnUVZ8gydnZ2d@bt.com...
    > On 29/08/2010 21:19, Aardvark wrote:
    >
    >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:10:12 -0400, *Peter Foldes wrote*:
    >>
    >>> Spyblaster works on IE and Firefox and is not dependant of the OS as was
    >>> told to you 100 times before.

    >>
    >> Would it work on *my* OS, ****wit? I'd like to know, just to keep my box
    >> safe.

    >
    > Mr Foldes appears to have become *very* confused of late, as you have witnessed
    > from this particular post to which you are responding, Aardvark. Even his spelling
    > has deteriorated.
    >
    > I think it important that others are made aware of the errors he is making, so my
    > cross-post has been restored.
    >
    >



  8. #18
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    "~BD~" <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:ZLadne9deplzBOfRnZ2dnUVZ8nqdnZ2d@bt.com...
    > siljaline wrote:
    >> Han wrote:
    >>> A friend is having a problem downloading the current Spywareblaster.
    >>> It
    >>> appears that the 2 topmost links to download Spywareblaster from
    >>> here
    >>> aren't working properly:
    >>> http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/sbdownload_free.html
    >>> The 3rd link appears to work.
    >>> Firefox 3.6.8 on Vista Home Basic

    >>
    >> It could be an issue with the software servers and not her | his
    >> set-up.
    >>
    >> This is personal but I *never* download anything from Major Geeks,
    >> *never* -
    >> I've never seen a more third-party ad-riddled site in a while, and
    >> they are not
    >> receptive to taking any down anytime soon</rant> </opinion>
    >>
    >> The below direct exe should work, let me know.
    >> (http://www.javacoolsoftware.net.nyud...tersetup43.exe)
    >>
    >> Silj
    >>
    >>

    >
    > It doesn't seem to work on my OS X machine!


    Why would it?

    Check out the system requirements - OS-X does *not* meet the
    requirements.



  9. #19
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Spyware Blaster Database update | Aug. 28 - 2010

    FromTheRafters wrote:

    >> It doesn't seem to work on my OS X machine!

    >
    > Why would it?
    >
    > Check out the system requirements - OS-X does *not* meet the
    > requirements.


    I've never done a WHOOOOOOOSHHHHHHHHH before! ;-)

    It's not a case of "it doesn't work" - it isn't *necessary* on a Mac!
    You, of all people, should know that!





  10. #20
    ~BD~ Guest

    SPYBLASTER - recently recommended by Peter Foldes

    On 29/08/2010 19:10, Peter Foldes wrote:
    >
    > Spyblaster works on IE and Firefox and is not dependant of the OS as was
    > told to you 100 times before.


    A strange thing to say I thought, but I was curious to know more about
    this software, which had previously been unknown to me, so I looked here:

    hxxp://www.spyblaster.com/

    Exploring further I discovered that it will *not* actually work on a
    Mac. But I went here to investigate further ......

    hxxp://www.spyblaster.com/videos.html well,to watch the videos actually!

    However, when I clicked on the appropriate link, in each instance I was
    whisked away to a URL which didn't 'work'.

    Maybe someone else - with appropriate skills to check for malware - will
    visit and report their findings.

    --
    Dave - PF also says "I still and will always will command respect from
    all outside of the SE group" - but *can* he be trusted, I wonder!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •