I received a warning from Google ......

[~BD~]

I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.

I tried with Chrome and got a similar warning, viz:-

http://i36.tinypic.com/347wjld.jpg

Just wondering if anyone else has experienced anything untoward at
xxx.uncoached.com ?

Here is some extra info provided by Google:

http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagn...d.com&hl=en-us

--
Dave

[Virus Guy]

~BD~ wrote:

> I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.

If you're not going to give us the exact url that spawned the warning,
then why bother posting?

It's a waste of time if we don't have the exact URL so we can grab a
sample of the malware.

[Buffalo]

Virus Guy wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.
>
> If you're not going to give us the exact url that spawned the warning,
> then why bother posting?
>
> It's a waste of time if we don't have the exact URL so we can grab a
> sample of the malware.

Isn't it xxx.uncoached.com as stated in the warning jpg and also stated by
BD in his post?
Buffalo

[FromTheRafters]

"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:i3jo71$hkc$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
> Virus Guy wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.
>>
>> If you're not going to give us the exact url that spawned the
>> warning,
>> then why bother posting?
>>
>> It's a waste of time if we don't have the exact URL so we can grab a
>> sample of the malware.
>
> Isn't it xxx.uncoached.com as stated in the warning jpg and also
> stated by
> BD in his post?

Not necessarily, the "uncoached" site may have been vulnerable at one
time to an exploit to redirect visitors to another site that indeed
hosts malware. If Virus Guy wants a malware sample he would have to
visit the malware server site not a redirection exploit site that might
not be continuing to redirect users. Sometimes it is an advertisement on
an otherwise legit site that gets a site marked as suspicious.

[David H. Lipman]

From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic@nomail.afraid.org>

| "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
| news:i3jo71$hkc$1@news.eternal-september.org...


>> Virus Guy wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:

>>>> I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.

>>> If you're not going to give us the exact url that spawned the
>>> warning,
>>> then why bother posting?

>>> It's a waste of time if we don't have the exact URL so we can grab a
>>> sample of the malware.

>> Isn't it xxx.uncoached.com as stated in the warning jpg and also
>> stated by
>> BD in his post?

| Not necessarily, the "uncoached" site may have been vulnerable at one
| time to an exploit to redirect visitors to another site that indeed
| hosts malware. If Virus Guy wants a malware sample he would have to
| visit the malware server site not a redirection exploit site that might
| not be continuing to redirect users. Sometimes it is an advertisement on
| an otherwise legit site that gets a site marked as suspicious.

Aka; Malvertisement.



--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Buffalo]

FromTheRafters wrote:
> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:i3jo71$hkc$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>
>> Virus Guy wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.
>>>
>>> If you're not going to give us the exact url that spawned the
>>> warning,
>>> then why bother posting?
>>>
>>> It's a waste of time if we don't have the exact URL so we can grab a
>>> sample of the malware.
>>
>> Isn't it xxx.uncoached.com as stated in the warning jpg and also
>> stated by
>> BD in his post?
>
> Not necessarily, the "uncoached" site may have been vulnerable at one
> time to an exploit to redirect visitors to another site that indeed
> hosts malware. If Virus Guy wants a malware sample he would have to
> visit the malware server site not a redirection exploit site that
> might not be continuing to redirect users. Sometimes it is an
> advertisement on an otherwise legit site that gets a site marked as
> suspicious.
Thanks,
Buffalo

[Ron]

On Aug 7, 9:43*am, Virus Guy <Vi...@Guy.com> wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> > I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.
>
> If you're not going to give us the exact url that spawned the warning,
> then why bother posting?
>
> It's a waste of time if we don't have the exact URL so we can grab a
> sample of the malware.

The URL was given.

[FromTheRafters]

"~BD~" <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:q7adndwLcrUpoMDRnZ2dnUVZ8nKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.
>
> I tried with Chrome and got a similar warning, viz:-
>
> http://i36.tinypic.com/347wjld.jpg

This part is interesting:

"Just visiting a site that hosts malware can infect your computer". I
suspect that ASCII will find that it *cannot* infect *his* computer -
thus making that statement blatantly false.

Perhaps they meant "may" instead of "can" - what do you think?

> Just wondering if anyone else has experienced anything untoward at
> xxx.uncoached.com ?

I have never experienced an exploit at a site, but in lieu of finding
some exploitable software these malware servers that you get routed to
can also serve human nature exploits. The human nature exploits are
obvious and would IMO constitute an *experience*. However, I'm not too
sure a user would even notice when such a site is able to exploit
software. A user may not *experience* any untoward behavior at a
compromised site or at the actual malware server site.

> Here is some extra info provided by Google:
>
> http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagn...d.com&hl=en-us

Hmmm - here they say *may* infect... I suppose that that means that the
two words mean exactly the same thing now. \

[~BD~]

FromTheRafters wrote:
> "~BD~"<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:q7adndwLcrUpoMDRnZ2dnUVZ8nKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>> I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL.
>>
>> I tried with Chrome and got a similar warning, viz:-
>>
>> http://i36.tinypic.com/347wjld.jpg
>
> This part is interesting:
>
> "Just visiting a site that hosts malware can infect your computer". I
> suspect that ASCII will find that it *cannot* infect *his* computer -
> thus making that statement blatantly false.
>
> Perhaps they meant "may" instead of "can" - what do you think?

Maybe they did!

>> Just wondering if anyone else has experienced anything untoward at
>> xxx.uncoached.com ?
>
> I have never experienced an exploit at a site, but in lieu of finding
> some exploitable software these malware servers that you get routed to
> can also serve human nature exploits. The human nature exploits are
> obvious and would IMO constitute an *experience*. However, I'm not too
> sure a user would even notice when such a site is able to exploit
> software. A user may not *experience* any untoward behavior at a
> compromised site or at the actual malware server site.

Exactly so! Here's a copy of email correspondence for digestion!

**

On 7 Aug 2010, at 17:30, CoyoteV responded with:

Not interested.


----- Original Message -----
From: David Bxxxxxx
To: CoyoteV (Mark)
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 8:00 AM
Subject: Your phpBB

I have never had an axe to grind with you, Mark, so am slightly
uncertain exactly why you have taken your current stance - but accept
that it is your prerogative to say 'no'.

Notwithstanding that, I feel that I should point out a discovery I have
made.

Using the *Google Chrome Browser* I visited your BB and, at this
particular URL received this warning

http://i33.tinypic.com/2573teb.jpg
hxxp://www.mindzon.com/lounge/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=133

You know far more about computing than I ever will. If you experiment
with Google Chrome you will note that if you change *133* to 132 or 134
there is *no* similar warning. It relates simply to the thread started
by Roy C.

Perhaps this matter is of little significance but I'd be interested in
your view.

David B.

[Peter Foldes]

BD

Mark will never let you post there on his site so do not even keep on trying.

You know the story Burn me once ,Shame on me. Burn me twice ,you are gone. And you
keep showing the same continuously to this day with the exception of scorched -
earth. It will not be long there either..

Banned by Ahuma,Annex,Doganet, 6 other servers. And you do not know why? LOL. You
are a Troll and a complete idiot

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

"~BD~" <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:WeidnQxlHuhbCsDRnZ2dnUVZ8tGdnZ2d@bt.com...
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> "~BD~"<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message