Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Anti Virus

  1. #11
    M.L. Guest

    Re: Anti Virus



    >>>>> Just purchased Dell computer Windows 7 Home (64) and with it came
    >>>>> McAfee. Thought Windows 7 had anti virus but evidently not. Any
    >>>>> feedback on McAfee?
    >>>
    >>> Replace it with the free Microsoft Security Essentials.
    >>>
    >>> http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/?mkt=en-us

    >>
    >> And watch your computer slow down.

    >
    >I'd like to know the experiences of others. Is MSE really that bad?


    No problems with MSSE on my Vista system.

  2. #12
    James Morrow Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    In article <Xns9DB5468D52166somewhere@69.16.185.250>,
    whoever@wherever.invalid says...
    <snip>

    > For what it's worth, Avira's Anti-Vir or Avast are the two I recommend if
    > you are looking for a free AV program. Antivir is the more effective of the
    > two, but Avast is more user friendly for newbies to deal with.
    >
    >
    >

    <snip>

    Microsoft updates every eight hours, Avast! updates every four hours
    and it is FREE. Avira's Anti-Vir has excellent detection but the update
    server is generally known to be slow.

    --
    James E. Morrow
    Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com

  3. #13
    Ron Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    On Jul 13, 9:54*pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
    wrote:
    > From: "Sam Spade" <sloopokes...@opto.net>
    >
    > | Just purchased Dell computer Windows 7 Home (64) and with it came McAfee.
    > | Thought Windows 7 had anti virus but evidently not. Any feedback on McAfee?
    > | Sam
    >
    > Replace it with Avira AntiVir.


    Reformatted this computer with W7 back in February and Avira 10
    wouldn't auto update. Tried it again last month and it still wouldn't
    update. So, I'm still using Avira 9.


  4. #14
    Lil' Abner Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    James Morrow <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in
    news:MPG.26a8152c965dff6698975f@extreme.x-privat.org:

    > In article <Xns9DB5468D52166somewhere@69.16.185.250>,
    > whoever@wherever.invalid says...
    ><snip>
    >
    >> For what it's worth, Avira's Anti-Vir or Avast are the two I
    >> recommend if you are looking for a free AV program. Antivir is the
    >> more effective of the two, but Avast is more user friendly for
    >> newbies to deal with.
    >>
    >>
    >>

    ><snip>
    >
    > Microsoft updates every eight hours, Avast! updates every four hours
    > and it is FREE. Avira's Anti-Vir has excellent detection but the
    > update server is generally known to be slow.


    There were problems there for a while, But I've had no problem with slow
    updates for months now.

    --
    --- Everybody has a right to my opinion. ---

  5. #15
    Lil' Abner Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    Ron <BigELilE05@msn.com> wrote in
    news:8eb0640f-e4bf-4719-8220-29da97f19970@g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com:

    > On Jul 13, 9:54*pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
    > wrote:
    >> From: "Sam Spade" <sloopokes...@opto.net>
    >>
    >> | Just purchased Dell computer Windows 7 Home (64) and with it came
    >> | McAfe

    > e.
    >> | Thought Windows 7 had anti virus but evidently not. Any feedback on
    >> | McA

    > fee?
    >> | Sam
    >>
    >> Replace it with Avira AntiVir.

    >
    > Reformatted this computer with W7 back in February and Avira 10
    > wouldn't auto update. Tried it again last month and it still wouldn't
    > update. So, I'm still using Avira 9.


    I dual boot Windows XP and Windows 7 and have Avira 10 in both installs. I
    use XP most all the time, but the few times I go into Windows 7, Avira
    updates itself during the first few minutes.
    Windows 7 has Vista all beat to hell, but I still have software and
    hardware issues. My computer is Windows 7 compatible but *I'm* not quite
    yet... :-)

    --
    --- Everybody has a right to my opinion. ---

  6. #16
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    From: "Lil' Abner" <blvstk@dogpatch.com>

    | James Morrow <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in
    | news:MPG.26a8152c965dff6698975f@extreme.x-privat.org:

    >> In article <Xns9DB5468D52166somewhere@69.16.185.250>,
    >> whoever@wherever.invalid says...
    >><snip>


    >>> For what it's worth, Avira's Anti-Vir or Avast are the two I
    >>> recommend if you are looking for a free AV program. Antivir is the
    >>> more effective of the two, but Avast is more user friendly for
    >>> newbies to deal with.




    >><snip>


    >> Microsoft updates every eight hours, Avast! updates every four hours
    >> and it is FREE. Avira's Anti-Vir has excellent detection but the
    >> update server is generally known to be slow.


    | There were problems there for a while, But I've had no problem with slow
    | updates for months now.

    Same here...


    --
    Dave
    http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
    Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  7. #17
    David Kaye Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    "Sam Spade" <sloopokespam@opto.net> wrote:
    >Just purchased Dell computer Windows 7 Home (64) and with it came McAfee.
    >Thought Windows 7 had anti virus but evidently not. Any feedback on McAfee?
    >Sam


    Ditch it.

    Go to the Microsoft website and download Security Essentials instead.


  8. #18
    David Kaye Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    FredW <fredw@blackholespam.net> wrote:

    >I just read that Microsoft considers an update every 8 hours sufficient.
    >(but you must switch WindowsUpdate to automatic.)


    I think it's ludicrous to update that frequently, but MS has taken so much
    crap from people that they probably feel forced to do it.

    >I have one av-application updating every hour
    >and one av-application updating every two hours.


    That's just plain stupid. STOOPID. All it does is tax an already taxed
    Internet infrastructure.


  9. #19
    David Kaye Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    "Lil' Abner" <blvstk@dogpatch.com> wrote:

    >And watch your computer slow down.
    >


    I've installed MSSE on several dozen computers. It only slowed down one. It
    was running a Pentium 3. I put in Avast instead and that works fine. Other
    computers have had no problem. I'm not sure why MSSE bogged down on the one
    computer, though.


  10. #20
    Bit Twister Guest

    Re: Anti Virus

    On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:19:32 +0200, FredW wrote:
    > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:55:47 -0500, M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:
    >>>| Just purchased Dell computer Windows 7 Home (64) and with it came McAfee.
    >>>| Thought Windows 7 had anti virus but evidently not. Any feedback on McAfee?

    >>
    >>Replace it with the free Microsoft Security Essentials.
    >>
    >>http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/?mkt=en-us

    >
    > I just read that Microsoft considers an update every 8 hours sufficient.


    Heheheh, what do you expect from a company who does not work on known
    exploits until it is in the wild.


    > I have one av-application updating every hour
    > and one av-application updating every two hours.
    >
    > Silly guys at Microsoft.
    > ;-)


    With a new malware generated every 20 seconds, you are getting behind
    as you read this reply. Not to mention the 1 to 6 weeks it takes AV
    vendors to catch the new malware for analysis, coding, testing, and
    roll out to the masses.

    Read about the latest malware fire drill here.
    http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9190

    Hard to believe this one spreads from one company network to another by just
    usb drives.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •