ASCII wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>>In article <4c22b8e0.2890500@EDCBIC>, me2@privacy.net says...
>>>
>>> Leythos wrote:
>>> >
>>> >That's the entire point, it doesn't matter if your systems are fully
>>> >patched, OS, AV, Apps, Firewall software, there are holes that will be
>>> >found and that people will exploit, you can only hope to minimize the
>>> >risk to your system by limiting your exposure to such things.
>>>
>>> If your exposure is reduced to nil, wouldn't that,
>>> and that only, be considered 'fully' patched?
>>
>>Nope, patched has nothing to do with exposure, exposure is WHERE YOU GO
>>AND WHAT REACHES YOUR COMPUTER. Patched has to do with eliminating the
>>threats of what your computer is exposed to.
>
> Maybe a spritz of WD-40 will unstick that caps-lock key.
>
>>If your exposure is nil, well, you are not connected to the internet in
>>any way.
>
> spoken like a true neophyte.

ASCII, you're such a ridiculously incompetent knowall prick that
I piss myself laughing at most of your posts.

Leythos can be a jooboi PITA at times, but you're an idiot who
blathers for the sake of blathering at ALL times.

FOAD.

--
newsgate 0.991