http://www.spywarebanter.co.uk/23744...an-abuser.html
(This sociopath who goes by the name of Raid/Dustin Cook is
always - HAS always, been involved in hateful altercations
from the beginning of his usuage of Usenet. He is so brave
telling other men - while safely online, what he would do
to them if he ever meets them. He equally victimizes women
on Usenet and the Web, sneering at them, reminding them
what he could do to them if he really got pissed. Is this a
man? Hell no. He's cowardly Usenet prowler with a twisted
mind that flees the reality of the real world and rolls
around Usenet like a wild dog rolling in another dog's
poop. He is a sick, lonely, twisted **** with an evil
cancer in his brain, for which he blames everyone else.)
(Here is more on how he outed a woman in alt.sex as a
*****, inviting all men to come to her address that he gave
out. He, again, in one of these posts below, states she is
a "Usenet *****". Whatever that is. He's always been the
same ****bag. He will always be the same ****bag. His posts
today are not different than they were ten years ago. He is
a savage sociopath.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Old September 18th 06, 11:10 AM posted to
alt.comp.virus,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.comp.anti-virus
The Demon of Mockery
external usenet poster
Posts: 3
Default Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
Hail Eris! wrote:
It seems to me that the lot of you are in need of some therapy,
although I doubt that would work.
The Outer Filth, Dustin Cook, who posted someone else's
personal contact info when he felt "threatened" by her
apparent psyche job on him (they'd exchanged emails, and he
was expecting her to "drop a dime" (allegedly, in
hacker/virus-writer lingo) on him) would be my top pick for
therapy. He psyched himself out...
Snarky
Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate Reply
With Quote
The Demon of Mockery
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by The Demon of Mockery
Find all threads started by The Demon of Mockery
#4 (permalink)
Old September 18th 06, 05:00 PM posted to
alt.comp.virus,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.comp.anti-virus,rec.skydiving
Dustin Cook
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,415
Default Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
The Demon of Mockery wrote:
Hail Eris! wrote:
It seems to me that the lot of you are in need of some
therapy, although I doubt that would work.
The Outer Filth, Dustin Cook, who posted someone else's
personal contact info when he felt "threatened" by her
apparent psyche job on him (they'd exchanged emails, and he
was expecting her to "drop a dime" (allegedly, in
hacker/virus-writer lingo) on him) would be my top pick for
therapy. He psyched himself out...
Snarky
Drop a dime on me? Amazing twist of history you have. You
guys really need to work on that. I suggest you take
rewording lessons from Rhonda, originally she was
believable..
What I did was drop a dime, or drop the docs, idiot. I
didn't suspect rhonda would do that, as she doesn't have
personal information of that type on me. If your going to
mimmic our lingo, so you don't look like a total retard
(read: ****tard), you should do yourself a favor and see
what the ****ing words mean. Doh!
Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate Reply With Quote
Dustin Cook
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Dustin Cook
Find all threads started by Dustin Cook
#5 (permalink)
Old September 18th 06, 05:04 PM posted to
alt.comp.virus,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.privacy.spywar
e,alt.os.windows-xp
Rhonda Lea Kirk
external usenet poster
Posts: 499
Default Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
Dustin Cook wrote:
The Demon of Mockery wrote:
Hail Eris! wrote:
It seems to me that the lot of you are in need of some
therapy, although I doubt that would work.
The Outer Filth, Dustin Cook, who posted someone else's
personal contact info when he felt "threatened" by her
apparent psyche job on him (they'd exchanged emails, and he
was expecting her to "drop a dime" (allegedly, in
hacker/virus-writer lingo) on him) would be my top pick for
therapy. He psyched himself out...
Snarky
Drop a dime on me? Amazing twist of history you have. You
guys really need to work on that. I suggest you take
rewording lessons from Rhonda, originally she was
believable..
What I did was drop a dime, or drop the docs, idiot. I
didn't suspect rhonda would do that, as she doesn't have
personal information of that type on me. If your going to
mimmic our lingo, so you don't look like a total retard
(read: ****tard), you should do yourself a favor and see
what the ****ing words mean. Doh!
You stated that you believed I intended to post or share
your emails.
I did not.
So you posted my address and telephone number anyway.
And I still haven't posted or shared your emails.
- --
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate Reply With Quote
Rhonda Lea Kirk
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Rhonda Lea Kirk
Find all threads started by Rhonda Lea Kirk
#6 (permalink)
Old September 18th 06, 05:40 PM posted to
alt.comp.virus,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.privacy.spywar
e,alt.os.windows-xp
Dustin Cook
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,415
Default Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
You stated that you believed I intended to post or share
your emails.
What I stated was and still state is that your a usenet
wh0re; It really had nothing to do with the emails. You
thought I quit talking to you over that, but.. I didn't.
The emails don't contain enough details to do me any real
harm. Yes, you have some background on my family life, and
you know a little about what I do for a living, which
surprises me as you make no effort to correct your ****ant
friends when they posted the diagostic? report they think I
fit.
I've learned that's how you are tho. I'm sure you'll come
back with a one or two line response to this post as well,
based on your previous acts. It seems anytime I strike a
good debate point, your quick to back off.
So you posted my address and telephone number anyway.
I posted a signature you provided in your emails, yes. You
emailed it to me; remember? A virtual business card I do
believe was the intention of that signature. What else
would explain the need to include a google map AND a fax
number?
And I still haven't posted or shared your emails.
So the claim you made of providing them to the police was
what then? Hot air? More bull****? My lawyer is still
waiting for initial contact, and since I'm being billed for
his time, I do expect it relatively soon. We'd like to get
this matter into a court room as soon as possible. I'd like
to collect legal fees as soon as possible as well. Be in
touch yes?
Like I said in a previous post today, you have more twists
and turns than some of the old roads we have here.
Dustin Cook
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Dustin Cook
Find all threads started by Dustin Cook
#7 (permalink)
Old September 18th 06, 11:56 PM posted to
alt.comp.virus,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.privacy.spywar
e,alt.os.windows-xp
Rhonda Lea Kirk
external usenet poster
Posts: 499
Default Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
Dustin Cook wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
You stated that you believed I intended to post or share
your emails.
What I stated was and still state is that your a usenet
wh0re; It really had nothing to do with the emails. You
thought I quit talking to you over that, but.. I didn't.
The emails don't contain enough details to do me any real
harm. Yes, you have some background on my family life, and
you know a little about what I do for a living, which
surprises me as you make no effort to correct your ****ant
friends when they posted the diagostic? report they think I
fit.
I think you have a personality disorder, so there's no
reason for me to correct anything.
The only real question is whether you're a danger to
yourself, because you are a documented danger to others.
I've learned that's how you are tho. I'm sure you'll come
back with a one or two line response to this post as well,
based on your previous acts. It seems anytime I strike a
good debate point, your quick to back off.
What debate point?
So you posted my address and telephone number anyway.
I posted a signature you provided in your emails, yes. You
emailed it to me; remember? A virtual business card I do
believe was the intention of that signature. What else
would explain the need to include a google map AND a fax
number?
Dustin, it was not a virtual business card, whatever the
**** that is. It was one of several sigs provided by Plaxo.
I didn't give it a whole lot of thought when I used it, and
I never paid much attention to the links it contained, of
which there were apparently two.
The fact remains that you posted my real life information
without my permission and you violated my privacy. And then
you posted it to alt.sex, with an invitation to all and
sundry to stop by, thereby endangering not just my safety
but that of my family.
And I still haven't posted or shared your emails.
So the claim you made of providing them to the police was
what then?
Ah...I see...no Dustin, giving your emails and your posts
to law enforcement isn't the same thing as "posting or
sharing" your emails, IMO.
You have put my family in danger with the alt.sex post.
That takes it to another level entirely.
Trying to spin it differently is only spin.
Hot air? More bull****? My lawyer is still waiting for
initial contact, and since I'm being billed for his time, I
do expect it relatively soon. We'd like to get this matter
into a court room as soon as possible. I'd like to collect
legal fees as soon as possible as well. Be in touch yes?
Dustin, if any action is taken against you, it will be
because a law enforcement agency deems it to be warranted
based on it's own investigation of the facts, which is
essentially the reading of posts and emails in
chronological order. No more, no less. You won't be
collecting anything from me, because at most, I am a
witness. The case will not bey styled Kirk v. Cook but US
v. Cook.
As I said, you can sue the FBI.
Like I said in a previous post today, you have more twists
and turns than some of the old roads we have here.
projection
- --
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate Reply With Quote
Rhonda Lea Kirk
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Rhonda Lea Kirk
Find all threads started by Rhonda Lea Kirk
#8 (permalink)
Old September 19th 06, 04:21 AM posted to
alt.usenet.kooks,alt.comp.virus.,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.privacy.spywa
re,alt.os.windows-xp
Rhonda Lea Kirk
external usenet poster
Posts: 499
Default What you may not know about your so called private
information could come back to bite you right in the ass!
Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
Dustin wrote:
The God of Odd Statements wrote in
news
Dustin, it was not a virtual business card, whatever the **** that
is. It was one of several sigs provided by Plaxo. I didn't give it a
whole lot of thought when I used it, and I never paid much attention
to the links it contained, of which there were apparently two.
Best to be paranoid, I suppose.
Sigs provided by Plaxo? It just magically knows your name, address,
phone number, mobile number, fax number, and just happens to have a
url for an online map? Excuse me if I think your full of ****, won't
you? That information doesn't just magically become inserted by
another program. You had to enter the information.
Of course I entered the information, Dustin. I never made the claim
that
I did not.
I've explained this before, in detail. I was subscribed to Plaxo, and
the sig was of a format provided by Plaxo. That's not the issue, it
has
never been the issue.
It has also never been the issue that I should not have put my
information in my sig. People do that. I can find countless folks who
put the same information in their email sigs. Once upon a
time--although
you were barely a teenager then--people even put their contact
information in their usenet sigs.
The issue is that you had no business publishing my contact
information
on usenet without my permission. Period.
And you certainly had no business posting my contact information in
alt.sex.
Once you sent the
first email with that as a signature, you gave up ANY expectation of
ANY kind of privacy.
You're wrong about that, y'know.
I have to respond to your dumbass troll friend because my killfilter
is working apparently. LOL!
No one cares about your broken plonker, you stupid twit.
The fact remains that you posted my real life information without my
permission and you violated my privacy. And then you posted it to
alt.sex, with an invitation to all and sundry to stop by, thereby
endangering not just my safety but that of my family.
The fact of the matter is Rhonda, I don't need your permission to
post
what's considered to be public information.
Just because it's in your possession doesn't mean it's public
information, Dustin.
I could have just as
easily taken a trip down to your courthouse, being as I know your
divorced and pulled up your records from the clerk, probably for less
than the cost of a cup of coffee. It's the public information age
*****, get used to it.
What does that have to do with my address and telephone number,
Dustin?
What does that have to do with an invitation posted to alt. sex?
If your state laws are similiar, those records would even contain
your
social security number, not blacked out. Available to anybody who
wanted it, nice n legal. Pretty scary huh *****?
My social security number is not a part of my final judgment of
divorce.
As for Florida, it's pretty careful about eliding such information.
New laws have been passed in the last couple of years, but records
already done aren't covered. The new laws state social security
numbers must be blacked out before the records can be made available
to the public. If your divorce is older than that law, you have to
make the request to have this done yourself. I'd suggest you do so.
As I said, there's no SSN in my judgment, and it has nothing to do
with
posting my address and telephone number to alt.sex.
It's merely alerting the authorities to the possibility of criminal
acts being performed as a result of his outing you. Incidentally, I
Do you know why the authorities haven't made an effort to establish
contact? It's simple, and saddening at the same time. What I did, as
unthinkable as you seem to take it, is perfectly legal. Rhonda
doesn't
from a legal standpoint have a right to privacy regarding who she is,
her phone numbers or even her residence. Hell, a trip down to her
local courthouse might digup even more "personal" information, that
you can take a copy of with you as an ordinary citizen for the cost
of the copies. What you decide to do with the information you gain is
your problem. She can't very well hold the courthouse liable if
someone uses her social security number to do various things.
No SSN available in my state, Dustin.
But it wasn't my SSN you posted. And because this is not my permanent
legal address, but merely the place where I live at this time, it is
not
a matter of public record anywhere.
Real-lifing people on usenet isn't wise, Dustin.
Not understanding the law isn't wise, troll. Not understanding how
things are done, and how usenet can affect you in real life is not
wise, troll.
Unfortunately, you're the one who does not understand the law,
Dustin.
Wising up yet?
Dustin is thinking in terms of lawsuits...LOL.
Dustin knows the law, thanks.
No. He does not. And practicing law without a license is frowned
upon--ask your attorney--so I suggest you stop giving me erroneous
legal
advice right now.
- --
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate Reply With Quote
Rhonda Lea Kirk
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Rhonda Lea Kirk
Find all threads started by Rhonda Lea Kirk
#9 (permalink)
Old September 19th 06, 06:01 AM posted to
alt.comp.virus,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.os.windows-
xp
James Egan
external usenet poster
Posts: 564
Default Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:56:34 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
wrote:
I think you have a personality disorder, so there's no reason for me
to
correct anything.
Since you say that about more or less everyone with whom you have a
disagreement it's hardly likely to be taken seriously.
snip
Dustin, if any action is taken against you, it will be because a law
enforcement agency deems it to be warranted based on it's own
investigation of the facts, which is essentially the reading of posts
and emails in chronological order. No more, no less. You won't be
collecting anything from me, because at most, I am a witness. The
case
will not bey styled Kirk v. Cook but US v. Cook.
If they read into it they will likely think it's Kook v Cook (which
it
is, of course)
Jim.
Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate Reply With Quote
James Egan
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by James Egan
Find all threads started by James Egan
#10 (permalink)
Old September 19th 06, 01:28 PM posted to
alt.comp.virus,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.os.windows-
xp
Rhonda Lea Kirk
external usenet poster
Posts: 499
Default Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
James Egan wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:56:34 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
wrote:
I think you have a personality disorder, so there's no reason for me
to correct anything.
Since you say that about more or less everyone with whom you have a
disagreement it's hardly likely to be taken seriously.
Whether here or in real life, it is never taken seriously by anyone
who
does not personally feels the effects. Very few people, if any, learn
from another's experience, which is why people like Dustin always
find a
new source of supply when the old one is used up.
snip
Dustin, if any action is taken against you, it will be because a law
enforcement agency deems it to be warranted based on it's own
investigation of the facts, which is essentially the reading of posts
and emails in chronological order. No more, no less. You won't be
collecting anything from me, because at most, I am a witness. The
case will not bey styled Kirk v. Cook but US v. Cook.
If they read into it they will likely think it's Kook v Cook (which
it
is, of course)
It doesn't matter if I'm crazy, because Dustin put my family in
danger
when he made that post to alt.sex inviting all and sundry to my home.
Actually, though, there are additional penalties in my state imposed
against those who harm people who are very young, very old or not
quite
right in the head, so it's all to the good if I'm kooky, particularly
since Dustin made similar claims prior to publishing my address.
Please, feel free to dig the hole a little deeper.
- --
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: Raid Ver. 0.4.6 (Raid's I.Q.)
Comment: Raid Is A Dangerous Sociopathic Monster
mQGiBEv5rOcRBADxvuuWmXxws8jvtc4o1P6eD7yi0bROD2koLk O+3fdtGpSi54tT
UMqWJ0iOvs3oDUZsgQ+n4pkwrLCvgrC0rQzq85T3oS/6tzIdqboTj/hsIkwJrvsT
RfdrIORMRMrRUQXOcae4A+XVjHR7nYLlVhzfatZcZw0XaLGvdO qdwfYj3QCg/4+j
lnraPsboXfnmcpEFabBbxhkEAMUrYAjMzl3cWeFng+TdiAomsQ zmiXPnOG8dcB1v
OlXCIgNRaKfXM2deNSho11o5I/kYCVBBrpSl/4Ou3yt9HHx5tyMBadVD0lLaOWn4
bxjVPuIVTmJPOUd3X1IEBjmP2qBBdRU04lBIFuRokpIb2zZhnr kNX5LyrJB1k42I
qHT1BACXc/Dy2SFGX2NB29msCPczKGo4FvOS4G1kAacDnBKoIErwP6/MXHpcF4Gb
Mx1Eb4s9IR5Af4pGLdpsfl2MC3OSgeby56BxvTo1YLjnxxoeJn 55aRVRpzgrEFyN
kZqAnGAZjWbWHU3i1ag2vtDFkZnVp5fWKYH+29C7hsapeuMbAr QEUmFpZIkAUwQQ
EQIAEwUCS/ms5wkLCQoIAgcDAQQCGQEACgkQvmBTcC1T9/WQrwCfZFGckHXx4/J2
KbefJqHD0+NH7OsAmwQnmaYlPP/rZ1Gah0EyBz/zW0OnuQINBEv5rO4QCADjDEBs
uorjWyUdnKenrVyM9ovZhSGpfCsMW9+ydRYCTYCAzsH/p39H0aiGgfdDngtucK9V
xnmz5DmItw0WQBTCLEZQZ0iPBMu8eN0Kot/PQ9ckIYBeE1AFQyQUm1kB7WywstUc
p26cs5Mp0QcY7dVB0AbmnO6Bs46Ss/ClATMzISEESDd73A7Shgp009HMPOJFx6YP
RxHKLJrpRYGQrJZqb/35DuqIegP1WZYfV3kG6DhPApt7SXc9JgAxbyXoWruWEd+M
bo5d6E80w2trqTsXM2qrbahfPuJG4bzEWvO1Mx4IQCPIXqhIDk 9sPnwyTZrVYfEs
P6cGyk/x43ns9zqvAAICB/46rb6F+hK3UrQcXyVgw6pJYgta3Eb57lM87rcnwrbj
XWxupSy5efwYznG22kIjhe9ct6AbA699d56NFWU5gwbVowO8Ee S/LGeB2OOc9PaW
gfSae9/vVI0PakkMXSm+J1KjgWCK4j7PzAg/Si72QduQr4jwnA5B75/OS172jcBu
ZBnAbQ/hSFetBsk+037CKpvsPyGX5MQv5ZBSZV3qzFFmo+bgX1QbQxFrg qAV8jyw
2UlQ0zU7G5oX7H859T9MWaqtkjPZHP+v6vqDH5YIuAIo6NA2d7 UZwzB766zpJeSI
OxkjbvbaNUV+w7oiIR8f4iQnOiIGsqUXwybAAtSaFhyriQBGBB gRAgAGBQJL+azu
AAoJEL5gU3AtU/f1X1wAoOfSc12FoPilEN0W1LGFCt6IpOLLAJ9yvzq7gaqipUL+
szxmvxA3SS3HRg==
=CTpL
- -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Raid Ver. 0.4.6 (Raid's I.Q.)
Comment: Raid Is A Dangerous Sociopathic Monster
iQA/AwUBTAH0yb5gU3AtU/f1EQIk5ACgshKHjMPt7pg8lthbLIYBh7EOXwIAoPCx
hct30TvST18q6tGTN5uQKsAw
=hcG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply With Quote