starwars <nonscrivetemi@tatooine.homelinux.net> wrote in
news:55a16cd91beed640476c583ee76d90bb@tatooine.hom elinux.net:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:53:51 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Not all laws should be respected; I am not a sheep who needs to
>> be led around like so many lemmings do.
>
> Spoken like the true sociopath he is.
>
> Laws forbidding carrying an illegal weapon mean nothing to him.

I don't carry any illegal weapons. My henry was purchased at a sporting
goods store by me, I passed state and federal background checks no
problem.

> Laws against killing people mean nothing to him:

I would have to disagree. I've yet to have to use lethal force on anyone.
Hence, I have no felony charges which would have denied my right to own
my rifle.

>>I've killed 2 other people in my lifetime. I had to serve 3
>>years for the 2nd fellow (I got caught, but they brought the
>>charges down) I'm hoping that you'll be a freebie kill.

Like I said in my previous signature, some people will eat up the stories
I would tell as if it was the gospel. Don't blame me because your a
sucker. Sadly tho, you really are a sucker; the rolling stones article
which has an "interview" with me; the truth behind it, I didn't speak to
Kim Neely; I +bd'd her from channel and later nuked her. In response
(retailation actually) she copy/pasted various items from usenet and
interviews for vx ezines that I had done. Pretty much the same Bs you've
been doing.

I suppose that's okay tho, because she was/is a reporter and your some
good joe out to protect the world from big bad Raid. Heh Heh. Right?
And yes, I asked that entirely in a sarcastic tone; just in case you
don't get/understand sarcasm.

> Laws against destroying people's computers with viruses he has
> written and passed mean nothing to him. (Do I really have to
> document this one?)

None of my viruses ever destroyed any computers. I wasn't into hardware
damage.

> No laws mean anything to a sociopath.

It's painfully obvious, atleast to me and some individuals who've been
reading along and emailing, that I'm not a sociopath; I do care about
things and I'm generally an honest person. For example, I don't steal, I
don't cheat people, and if I borrow money or owe for something; I pay it
on the date we agreed on. I am dishonest in the since that I do
occasionally speed 5-10mph above the limit; and don't always use my turn
signals. Terrible, isn't it?

>>Look, obviously your a spoon fed "anti pot" person; likely
>>believes every single thing the government tells you as well;
>>but don't confuse those of us who don't march to that drum beat
>> of being bull****ters. You'd be in the minority.
>
> He's a liar. Every poll shows that the majority of people are
> against the legalization of yet another intoxicant, plus one
> that destroys the body even in moderate use. Yes, there is an
> exception in a few states for medical use.

http://www.google.com/
#hl=en&source=hp&q=marijuana+legalization+articles &aq=8&aqi=g10
&aql=&oq=marijuana+legal&gs_rfai=&fp=119c5f3496e7b dc2

http://economics.about.com/od/mariju...na_Legalizatio
n.htm

http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...htmlhttp://www.
time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1889021,00.html

http://www.alternet.org/drugs/60959/
http://socialissues.wiseto.com/Topic...onOfMarijuana/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...05333978437228
..html

Their's thousands upon thousands more enlightening articles if you click
the google link. Many of them cover your so called claims of it doing
bodily harm even in "moderate" use. Some even tell you exactly why it's
illegal (and your a racist if you support the illegality; as it was done
with purely racial interests in mind; in the 1930s).

The others pretty much blow your slanted "nobody wants it legal"
viewpoint right out of the water. Really educational, should you take the
opportunity being provided to you.


> A few polls:
> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...95-503544.html
> http://www.pollingreport.com/drugs.htm
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...ll-shows-m_n_5
> 43952.html
>
> (Tons more all over the Web. Raid/Dustin Cook is a liar, as
> usual.)

See above.

> ****-for-brains Raid/Dustin Cook lies again:
>>I can find the same slanted view to support my argument as
>>well.
>
> Probably, if the poll was paid for and conducted by druggies,
> like those at UC Berkley, etc. But no mainline reputable media
> source bears out this dishonest *******'s assumption, which he
> distorts as fact.

See above. Time magazine is considered reputable by most persons I know.
Unless you have something against them?


>>As far as concience goes, dude, look at you, hiding behind a
>>remailer, copying/pasting whatever comes up in google.
>>Pot-kettle-pitch black.
>
> Again, the twisted psyche of the sociopath shows through. In
> his sick mind, his actions of virus writing/passing,
> continuing threats of violence against others, killing people,
> years of lies and deceit, equals using a remailer in order to
> protect oneself against his violence.

Protect yourself? Bro, your just slandering my name is all; and your
using the remailer due to the increase of lawsuits regarding slander and
libel all over usenet. People are going to court and actually winning
damages. Your a coward who has to hide. Not that I'd bother even trying
to sue you for anything, it's expensive and hardly worth the effort to
me.

I do find it slightly amusing that you think you have to protect yourself
from me. Obviously, I have skills that concern you eh? Don't worry, I
quit messing with people years ago. Offly insulting fellow that hides
behind a remailer to protect him/herself from me tho.

Do you just run your mouth alot in real life too?

> Raid/Dustin Cook *is* a sociopath. The record of his Usenet
> "life" underscores every aspect of the personality of a
> sociopath.

Obviously, it doesn't.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: Raid Ver. 0.4.6 (Raid's I.Q.)

If my IQ was really that low, why are you hiding behind a remailer to
protect yourself from me?

I do find it pretty funny myself that you are scared of me, but I don't
really see why. So, I will ask again, mostly for humour, just what
exactly have I ever done to you?

> Comment: Raid Is A Dangrous Sociopathic Monster

So says the coward who has to protect himself from me. You just don't
want to take responsibility for your actions or your words. You're a
coward. I use my real name, why don't you?


--
Feel free to steal this tagline!