Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Raid/Dustin Cook & His Twisted Logic Regarding His Spreading Viruses

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    James Egan Guest

    Re: Raid/Dustin Cook & His Twisted Logic Regarding His Spreading Viruses


    On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:59:56 -0400, "FromTheRafters"
    <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    >I think the
    >author must share in the responsibility....having written it.


    And so do I. As far as I'm concerned, making the stuff freely
    available to anyone who wanted it was just a method of spreading which
    exploited a loophole in the law to avoid recrimination.


    Jim


  2. #2
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: Raid/Dustin Cook & His Twisted Logic Regarding His Spreading Viruses

    "James Egan" <jegan@jegan.com> wrote in message
    news:85i1rhF31fU1@mid.individual.net...
    >
    > On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:59:56 -0400, "FromTheRafters"
    > <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    >
    >>I think the
    >>author must share in the responsibility....having written it.

    >
    > And so do I. As far as I'm concerned, making the stuff freely
    > available to anyone who wanted it was just a method of spreading which
    > exploited a loophole in the law to avoid recrimination.


    I'm reminded of an episode of "The Simpsons" where Bart sets in motion
    things that result in an offense of some sort. He then exclaims "*I*
    didn't do it!".

    Art imitates life.

    Back to the "spreading" as opposed to "distributing" - consider a worm
    program. Often instead of just executing it and allowing it to spread,
    it gets distributed as widely as possible (spammed, or published, or
    posted and/or artificially made a popular search result) so as to have
    multiple starting points. Spreading is a function of the program, and
    distributing it is an outside function (possibly another program).



  3. #3
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Raid/Dustin Cook & His Twisted Logic Regarding His Spreading Viruses

    James Egan <jegan@jegan.com> wrote in news:85i1rhF31fU1@mid.individual.net:

    > On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:59:56 -0400, "FromTheRafters"
    > <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    >
    >>I think the
    >>author must share in the responsibility....having written it.

    >
    > And so do I. As far as I'm concerned, making the stuff freely
    > available to anyone who wanted it was just a method of spreading which
    > exploited a loophole in the law to avoid recrimination.
    >
    >
    > Jim


    Fine. The thing is tho, it's all very old news; I moved on. People who have
    a grudge against some DOS virus causing them grief probably need to get out
    doors more.


    --
    Feel free to steal this tagline!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •