Re: Is MBAMMARIES is a 100% safe application?

[~BD~]

I'm sure David H. Lipman intended to write:

Dave *is* a good guy!

+

He didn't really mean to say this (surely!) ...........

> If he was a "good guy" he wouldn't be trolling the news groups, he would not be siding
> with a well documented code thief and liar, he would not have been ToS'd from Aumha.Net
> and he would not have violated the ToS/AUP of Malwarebytes.
>
> Now it is time for YOU to STFU.

BD says ...

Jenn can - and will - say whatever she wishes! ;-)

She has my full support, btw!


> Your "good guy" thinks he can do whatever he wants when he wants without scrutiny or conseqences.

BD says - well, indeed I *can*, here on Usenet!

I have permission from the very *highest* authority!

Now ........

@ D H Lipman

You will note that Peter Foldes has effectively called you a liar in
this thread. You said I was *not* given a warning - *he* says I was.
Only one of you can be right!

Please explain why readers should believe you, Mr Lipman, and recognise
Mr Foldes as the miscreant. Thanks in anticipation.

--
Dave BD

[Peter Foldes]

There you go again twisting and spinning everything you usual way. You are an idiot
and a brainless one at that.

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hsp9pv$4ml$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> I'm sure David H. Lipman intended to write:
>
> Dave *is* a good guy!
>
> +
>
> He didn't really mean to say this (surely!) ...........
>
>> If he was a "good guy" he wouldn't be trolling the news groups, he would not be
>> siding
>> with a well documented code thief and liar, he would not have been ToS'd from
>> Aumha.Net
>> and he would not have violated the ToS/AUP of Malwarebytes.
>>
>> Now it is time for YOU to STFU.
>
> BD says ...
>
> Jenn can - and will - say whatever she wishes! ;-)
>
> She has my full support, btw!
>
>
>> Your "good guy" thinks he can do whatever he wants when he wants without scrutiny
>> or conseqences.
>
> BD says - well, indeed I *can*, here on Usenet!
>
> I have permission from the very *highest* authority!
>
> Now ........
>
> @ D H Lipman
>
> You will note that Peter Foldes has effectively called you a liar in this thread.
> You said I was *not* given a warning - *he* says I was.
> Only one of you can be right!
>
> Please explain why readers should believe you, Mr Lipman, and recognise Mr Foldes
> as the miscreant. Thanks in anticipation.
>
> --
> Dave BD
>

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> There you go again twisting and spinning everything you usual way.
>

I said ....

"You will note that Peter Foldes has effectively called you a liar in
this thread. You said I was *not* given a warning - *he* says I was.
Only one of you can be right!"

So were *you* correct - or was Mr Lipman?

--
Dave

[Bullwinkle]

Care to comment on your favorite new 'buddy'
being a pot head?


"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hsqn9r$uat$1@news.eternal-september.org...

--
Dave