Re: Is MBAM is a 100% safe application

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~" <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>
>> There are Jihad members posting here.
>> What are you going to do about it?
>
> The only "Jihad" posting is against Dustin.

And Dustin needs to put every morphing one of them into his goddam killfile.
Even if he does that, it won't stop immediately, but it will never stop
unless he stops making it worth their while.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to
be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net>


>> The only "Jihad" posting is against Dustin.

| And Dustin needs to put every morphing one of them into his goddam killfile.
| Even if he does that, it won't stop immediately, but it will never stop
| unless he stops making it worth their while.

{ sigh }

Yes....




--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Heather]

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:htk9uu01ut7@news3.newsguy.com...
> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net>
>
>
>>> The only "Jihad" posting is against Dustin.
>
> | And Dustin needs to put every morphing one of them into his goddam
> killfile.
> | Even if he does that, it won't stop immediately, but it will never stop
> | unless he stops making it worth their while.
>
> { sigh }
>
> Yes....

Double *sigh and yes*.......and I must have missed the *jihad* one.....like
I care. But I do agree with Rhonda....it will never stop while he keeps
feeding them.

HF
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
>
>

[Dave U. Random]

On Wed, 26 May 2010 18:15:42 -0400, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:

>From: "~BD~" <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>
>> There are Jihad members posting here.
>> What are you going to do about it?
>
>The only "Jihad" posting is against Dustin.

How about this senile old fart? He's so old he can't read,
or he wants Dirtbag Krook to go on writing/passing viruses.
Without virus writing scum like Raidy, ****lips wouldn't
have a Usenet life pretending he knows what the **** he's
mumbling about half the time.

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
news:865nv3F5a4U1@mid.individual.net:

> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "~BD~" <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>>
>>> There are Jihad members posting here.
>>> What are you going to do about it?
>>
>> The only "Jihad" posting is against Dustin.
>
> And Dustin needs to put every morphing one of them into his goddam
> killfile. Even if he does that, it won't stop immediately, but it
> will never stop unless he stops making it worth their while.
>

Ahh, well; if I don't say anything, some ignorant people are bound to
believe the bull**** and attack me for it. I can name a few of them right
off the top of my head, and they're regulars here. Killfiling doesn't do
a ****ing thing about stupid people; not a damn thing. If you don't speak
up and defend yourself, people will tend to believe the ******* bashing
on you. IE: your not speaking up confirms the claims.

Why are you even in this Rhonda? You and I aren't exactly friends. Why do
you care one way or the other? You know what, don't bother answering the
questions...




--
Are you a former BBSer? Want to go back in time to the old days of
ANSI and Renegade? Fire up telnet and go here then: ttb.slyip.com

[James Egan]

On Thu, 27 May 2010 00:10:37 GMT, Dustin Cook
<bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:

>Ahh, well; if I don't say anything, some ignorant people are bound to
>believe the bull**** and attack me for it.

And if they do you can put them straight. That's not what you're doing
with the remailer right now.


>I can name a few of them right
>off the top of my head, and they're regulars here.

If they're regulars they won't be ignorant of the situation and
therefore won't believe the bull****.


> Killfiling doesn't do
>a ****ing thing about stupid people; not a damn thing. If you don't speak
>up and defend yourself, people will tend to believe the ******* bashing
>on you. IE: your not speaking up confirms the claims.
>

Not speaking up confirms you're not bothered about what some idiot is
spouting off.


>Why are you even in this Rhonda? You and I aren't exactly friends. Why do
>you care one way or the other? You know what, don't bother answering the
>questions...

I can't see how having a go at Rhonda is going to aid your current
cause. That's assuming your current cause is to stop the anti-raid
noise rather than perpetuate the issue. Which is ir?



Jim.

[~BD~]

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:htk6id029qr@news7.newsguy.com...
| From: "~BD~" <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
|
|| There are Jihad members posting here.
|| What are you going to do about it?
|
| The only "Jihad" posting is against Dustin.


Maybe that's not exactly the whole story, David!


"Non scrivetemi" <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote in
message
news:b7a70d434f8533afc1d6f46de5e6c53a@pboxmix.wins tonsmith.info...
| Once upon a time people fled the tyrannical "censorship" on annexcafe
and
| landed in this little newsgroup alt.politics.scorched-earth where they
felt
| free to express their views, unfettered by Gooden and his goons. Time
| passed, and somehow these freedom-loving refugees lost their freedom,
their
| free will. All semblance of opinion became subservient to an
obsession
| upon and by one sole influence who ironically had been banished by the
| tyrant Gooden from his server.
|
| Tell me, who was looking out for whom? You got what you wanted and
have
| squandered it. It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic.


Thought you might like to know what's been said elsewhere! :-)

--
Dave BD

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
> news:865nv3F5a4U1@mid.individual.net:
>
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "~BD~" <.BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>
>>>> There are Jihad members posting here.
>>>> What are you going to do about it?
>>>
>>> The only "Jihad" posting is against Dustin.
>>
>> And Dustin needs to put every morphing one of them into his
>> goddam killfile. Even if he does that, it won't stop
>> immediately, but it will never stop unless he stops making it
>> worth their while.
>>
>
> Ahh, well; if I don't say anything, some ignorant people are
> bound to believe the bull**** and attack me for it.

I refer you to the following, which is actually a blog post about the
lawsuit in which I was a defendant:

http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives...e_defamati.htm

"Doing research for this blog post required me to go back into USENET, a
place I haven't been in years, and I was instantly reminded why I don't go
there any more. Putting aside the signal-to-noise ratio, I simply could not
intellectually comprehend most of the posts I saw. It's like the posts were
written for people who live in a parallel English-speaking universe with a
very different grammar and logic than mine. Who is still reading and writing
this stuff??? And who in the world takes anything in an unmoderated USENET
group seriously???"

Note the last line. Then note it again. And again. And again, until you stop
responding to this bs.

> I can name a
> few of them right off the top of my head, and they're regulars
> here. Killfiling doesn't do a ****ing thing about stupid people;
> not a damn thing. If you don't speak up and defend yourself,
> people will tend to believe the ******* bashing on you. IE: your
> not speaking up confirms the claims.

Not true.

I married a kookologist--*after* all the bull**** in auk. Actually, while it
was still ongoing. What does that tell you?

> Why are you even in this Rhonda? You and I aren't exactly
> friends. Why do you care one way or the other? You know what,
> don't bother answering the questions...

I read this group, and the bs is annoying. Moreover, you used one of my
replies (edited to suit your purpose, I might add--don't do it again) to
respond to someone else. Further, the incident in which my name and address
were posted to alt.sex was brought into this. I'd say that I have an
interest.

Besides which, it's a public group, one that you are also disrupting with
your inability to use your killfile. That gives me another very good reason
to comment.

Just let it go. Stop replying. Take a lesson from 4Q who just walked away
rather than hang around for Paulin's repeated defamation of his character.
(Frankly, I wish 4Q weren't gone, but his absence did put an end to "The
Apostle" so everyone owes him.) Eventually, your continued replies will have
an effect that is the opposite of what you want--everyone will wish you were
gone rather than just wishing the trolls would put a lid on it. No one cares
what they're saying--they believe what they believe for good or ill without
regard for the trolls--but I guarantee that everyone will weary of you
entirely if you continue to reply.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to
be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey