Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?

[Jenn]

"JD" <JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:VOidnRP-lLfWp0PWnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@posted.grandecom...
> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "JD"<JD@example.invalid>
>>
>> | David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>>
>>>> | sexually-oriented
>>
>>>> | **
>>
>>>> | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture.
>>>> IMO
>>>> | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used
>>>> to
>>>> | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all.
>>
>>>> You were given two chances.
>>
>>
>> | Each time you reply, he comes back with more ignorant bs. He's a fool
>> | asking for others to not be foolish. He seeks the real truth but he
>> | speaks in lies. If you stop replying to boater Dave maybe he'll go
>> away.
>> | Maybe. God I hope so. Probably not.
>>
>> | But it's worth a try. 8-)
>>
>> Thank you. You are right.
>> I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post.
>>


silly person ... nothing is going to happen ... people will pretend to not
read daves posts.. and then ya'll will begin responding because that's what
happens on ngs.
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[Jenn]

"Leythos" <spam999free@rrohio.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.26489539c72b7efa98a328@us.news.astraweb.c om...
> In article <yIidnXGEzOJW8UPWnZ2dnUVZ8uudnZ2d@bt.com>,
> BoaterDave@hotmail..co.uk says...
>>
>> Toxic wrote:
>> > On Mon, 03 May 2010 00:58:00 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Here is the picture I posted. http://tinypic.com/r/ziu8lk/5

> That image does not belong linked in a public group where underage
> people are known to visit. It's an ADULT content image. It certainly
> does not belong posted on a technical support group/forum.

> I'm not offended, but I'm an old fart. I would terminate your account
> and BAN your IP if you had posted that to one of my support forums or
> one of the non-profit groups support forums I help maintain.

You're an old fart huh? How old is Old? You'd think an old fart would
understand another old farts idea of a fun image and just give them a slap
on the hand, delete the image, and move on.

> Posting that image to a support group is insulting to the board owners
> and users.

baloney ... people need to get a sense of humor .....

--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[Jenn]

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:hrks1d0a7j@news5.newsguy.com...
> From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>
>
> | I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no way
> | pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to be
> | offensive.
>
>
>
> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules
>
> Terms of Use:
>
> "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful,
> threatening,
> sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable
> laws. In addition
> you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam
> (injecting a
> comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a website
> offering the
> same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this
> website), the use of
> signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web
> traffic to a site of
> interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This
> includes the
> Personal Message feature."
>
>


so whats your point? The image is not any of that.
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[Max Wachtel]

Leythos wrote:

> That image does not belong linked in a public group where underage
> people are known to visit. It's an ADULT content image. It certainly
> does not belong posted on a technical support group/forum.
>
> I'm not offended, but I'm an old fart. I would terminate your account
> and BAN your IP if you had posted that to one of my support forums or
> one of the non-profit groups support forums I help maintain.
>
> Posting that image to a support group is insulting to the board owners
> and users.

+1
--
This message was created using SeaMonkey Portable.
http://portableapps.com/apps/interne...onkey_portable
Virus Removal Instructions
http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home
Max's Favorite Freeware
http://sites.google.com/site/keeping...clean/freeware

[JD]

Jenn wrote:
> "JD"<JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:VOidnRP-lLfWp0PWnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@posted.grandecom...
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "JD"<JD@example.invalid>
>>>
>>> | David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>>> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>>>
>>>>> | sexually-oriented
>>>
>>>>> | **
>>>
>>>>> | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture.
>>>>> IMO
>>>>> | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used
>>>>> to
>>>>> | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all.
>>>
>>>>> You were given two chances.
>>>
>>>
>>> | Each time you reply, he comes back with more ignorant bs. He's a fool
>>> | asking for others to not be foolish. He seeks the real truth but he
>>> | speaks in lies. If you stop replying to boater Dave maybe he'll go
>>> away.
>>> | Maybe. God I hope so. Probably not.
>>>
>>> | But it's worth a try. 8-)
>>>
>>> Thank you. You are right.
>>> I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post.
>>>
>
>
> silly person ... nothing is going to happen ... people will pretend to not
> read daves posts.. and then ya'll will begin responding because that's what
> happens on ngs.

You ever heard the term "$hit for brains"?

You and boater Dave bring so little to this newsgroup. Yes, people
respond because they hope you will understand the nature of these
newsgroups but you won't. Hence the term $**** for brains.

Actually it would be an improvement if you had $hit for brains!

8-)

--
JD..

[Jenn]

"JD" <JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:LeadncBBJ_dVGELWnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@posted.grand ecom...
> Jenn wrote:

>>>> Thank you. You are right.
>>>> I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post.

>> silly person ... nothing is going to happen ... people will pretend to
>> not
>> read daves posts.. and then ya'll will begin responding because that's
>> what
>> happens on ngs.


> You ever heard the term "$hit for brains"?

yeah ... idiots use that phrase when they have come to the conclusion that
they have no valid argument so they have to resort to phrases like that.
it's supposed to make them feel more like men, but it really just shows off
their lacking IQ score.


> You and boater Dave bring so little to this newsgroup.

.... and you bring what to this group? oh I forgot ... you bring phrases like
"$hit for brains" and you think it's somehow cute and makes you look smart?
I see... are you like 15 years old?


> Yes, people respond because they hope you will understand the nature of
> these newsgroups but you won't. Hence the term $**** for brains.

ahh ... so you think you have the IQ now, to explain the nature of
newsgroups? ... but I see you can't seem to get past your need to use foul
language. You should probably regroup and try again to communicate on an
adult level if you want to be taken seriously.

> Actually it would be an improvement if you had $hit for brains!

There you go again, showing just how low of an IQ you have going on in that
head of yours. If you keep trying, perhaps you will be able to communicate
like a grown up soon.

--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[JD]

Jenn wrote:
> "JD"<JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:LeadncBBJ_dVGELWnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@posted.grand ecom...
>> Jenn wrote:
>
>>>>> Thank you. You are right.
>>>>> I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post.
>
>>> silly person ... nothing is going to happen ... people will pretend to
>>> not
>>> read daves posts.. and then ya'll will begin responding because that's
>>> what
>>> happens on ngs.
>
>
>> You ever heard the term "$hit for brains"?
>
> yeah ... idiots use that phrase when they have come to the conclusion that
> they have no valid argument so they have to resort to phrases like that.
> it's supposed to make them feel more like men, but it really just shows off
> their lacking IQ score.
>
>
>> You and boater Dave bring so little to this newsgroup.
>
> ... and you bring what to this group? oh I forgot ... you bring phrases like
> "$hit for brains" and you think it's somehow cute and makes you look smart?
> I see... are you like 15 years old?
>
>
>> Yes, people respond because they hope you will understand the nature of
>> these newsgroups but you won't. Hence the term $**** for brains.
>
> ahh ... so you think you have the IQ now, to explain the nature of
> newsgroups? ... but I see you can't seem to get past your need to use foul
> language. You should probably regroup and try again to communicate on an
> adult level if you want to be taken seriously.
>
>> Actually it would be an improvement if you had $hit for brains!
>
> There you go again, showing just how low of an IQ you have going on in that
> head of yours. If you keep trying, perhaps you will be able to communicate
> like a grown up soon.
>

Thanks for the reply. I rest my case. SFB it is!

--
JD..

[Jenn]

"JD" <JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:yaOdnUnrR8vqAkLWnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@posted.grand ecom...
> Jenn wrote:
>> "JD"<JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:LeadncBBJ_dVGELWnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@posted.grand ecom...
>>> Jenn wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Thank you. You are right.
>>>>>> I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post.
>>
>>>> silly person ... nothing is going to happen ... people will pretend to
>>>> not
>>>> read daves posts.. and then ya'll will begin responding because that's
>>>> what
>>>> happens on ngs.
>>
>>
>>> You ever heard the term "$hit for brains"?
>>
>> yeah ... idiots use that phrase when they have come to the conclusion
>> that
>> they have no valid argument so they have to resort to phrases like that.
>> it's supposed to make them feel more like men, but it really just shows
>> off
>> their lacking IQ score.
>>
>>
>>> You and boater Dave bring so little to this newsgroup.
>>
>> ... and you bring what to this group? oh I forgot ... you bring phrases
>> like
>> "$hit for brains" and you think it's somehow cute and makes you look
>> smart?
>> I see... are you like 15 years old?
>>
>>
>>> Yes, people respond because they hope you will understand the nature of
>>> these newsgroups but you won't. Hence the term $**** for brains.
>>
>> ahh ... so you think you have the IQ now, to explain the nature of
>> newsgroups? ... but I see you can't seem to get past your need to use
>> foul
>> language. You should probably regroup and try again to communicate on an
>> adult level if you want to be taken seriously.
>>
>>> Actually it would be an improvement if you had $hit for brains!
>>
>> There you go again, showing just how low of an IQ you have going on in
>> that
>> head of yours. If you keep trying, perhaps you will be able to
>> communicate
>> like a grown up soon.
>>
>
> Thanks for the reply. I rest my case. SFB it is!
>


Does your momma really let you stay up this late?
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[PajaP]

On Mon, 3 May 2010 18:25:07 -0500, "Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday>
wrote:

>
>"Leythos" <spam999free@rrohio.com> wrote in message
>news:MPG.26489539c72b7efa98a328@us.news.astraweb. com...
>> Posting that image to a support group is insulting to the board owners
>> and users.
>
>baloney ... people need to get a sense of humor .....

+1, AOL and me too (because like the 'regulars' I like to make
meaningful posts)

[~BD~]

Jenn wrote:

>
> I've seen the image.. it's not porn. It's silly Easter fun. I wouldn't put
> it on a ng that kids were on.. but I'm guessing kids don't use malwarebytes
> forum, either.
>
>

I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no way
pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to be
offensive.

It was also in the *Honorary Members* group which is not, as far as I'm
aware, accessible by the general public or children.

Maybe that point will be acknowledged. What odds on that?

FYI - Malwarebytes is much sharper than Annexcafe - they *have*
identified me and blocked my registration under my 'new' posting name ..

.... which was *Beady* and using my original (and current) email address!

Am I /really/ trying to hide, do you think? ;-)

I think Dustin said somewhere that the posting of the picture wasn't, in
fact, the real reason for my exclusion - but I can't find that post of
his right now. It will turn up, never fear!

Thanks for your comments, Jenn. Enjoy your day!

--
Dave