Leythos wrote:
> In article<yIidnXGEzOJW8UPWnZ2dnUVZ8uudnZ2d@bt.com>,
> BoaterDave@hotmail..co.uk says...
>>
>> Toxic wrote:
>>> On Mon, 03 May 2010 00:58:00 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Here is the picture I posted. http://tinypic.com/r/ziu8lk/5
>>>>
>>>> I'd be very interested to learn how many folk /here/ consider this image
>>>> to be 'porn' rather than just a bit of fun.
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting that an image of the very font of neonatal sustenance,
>>> is considered taboo yet as the most horrific depictions of carnage
>>> and violence are routinely celebrated.
>
> That image does not belong linked in a public group where underage
> people are known to visit. It's an ADULT content image. It certainly
> does not belong posted on a technical support group/forum.
>
> I'm not offended, but I'm an old fart. I would terminate your account
> and BAN your IP if you had posted that to one of my support forums or
> one of the non-profit groups support forums I help maintain.
>
> Posting that image to a support group is insulting to the board owners
> and users.
>

Your comments are duly noted.

Thank you.