Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?

[David H. Lipman]

From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>


| I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no way
| pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to be
| offensive.



http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules

Terms of Use:

"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening,
sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. In addition
you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam (injecting a
comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a website offering the
same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this website), the use of
signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web traffic to a site of
interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This includes the
Personal Message feature."



--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[JD]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk> wrote in news:uf6dnfDt-
> LfgU0DWnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in
>>> news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> OK - I'm convinced at last.
>>>>
>>>> Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
>>>> **********************************
>>>>
>>>> See post number 3 - here:-
>>>>
>>>> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...l=Malwarebytes
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yay! Thank God...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I wrote to Malwarebytes and apologised, btw.
>>
>> Whilst I can (and have) registered again under another name, I'd prefer
>> to have my ban rescinded and revert to being BD.
>>
>> How would you feel about putting in a good word for me, Dustin?
>
> Are you smoking crack or heavily drinking? You just told me you forged
> yourself a new identity to evade the BAN previously placed on you, and
> then you want me to put in a good word for you? Laughable, frakking
> laughable. You lack honor and disipline.
>
>
>
>
>
Don't you know? Sometimes you have to throw out honor and discipline,
maybe lie a little because boater Dave seeks "only the truth."

You know, if nobody replied to boater Dave he might just go away. Maybe.
We can only hope. 8-)

--
JD..

[~BD~]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> ~BD~<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk> wrote in news:uf6dnfDt-
> LfgU0DWnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in
>>> news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> OK - I'm convinced at last.
>>>>
>>>> Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
>>>> **********************************
>>>>
>>>> See post number 3 - here:-
>>>>
>>>> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...l=Malwarebytes
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yay! Thank God...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I wrote to Malwarebytes and apologised, btw.
>>
>> Whilst I can (and have) registered again under another name, I'd prefer
>> to have my ban rescinded and revert to being BD.
>>
>> How would you feel about putting in a good word for me, Dustin?
>
> Are you smoking crack or heavily drinking? You just told me you forged
> yourself a new identity to evade the BAN previously placed on you, and
> then you want me to put in a good word for you? Laughable, frakking
> laughable.
>


Just testing your reaction, Dustin! ;-)

I've *forged* nothing - I've broken no laws either.

Here is the picture I posted. http://tinypic.com/r/ziu8lk/5

I'd be very interested to learn how many folk /here/ consider this image
to be 'porn' rather than just a bit of fun.

> You lack honor and discipline.

No - I don't.

In fact, the 'Management' at Malwarebytes, by choosing not to
correspond, have shown very poor management skills.

--
Dave - Mr Lipman need not respond!

"Rules are made for the obeyance of fools and the guidance of wise men."
- Douglas Bader

[David H. Lipman]

From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>



>> You lack honor and discipline.

| No - I don't.

Yes - You do!

| In fact, the 'Management' at Malwarebytes, by choosing not to
| correspond, have shown very poor management skills.

The management skills of Malwarewarebytes is excellent as they properly and judiciously
enforced the rules YOU agreed to abide by.

http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules

Terms of Use:

"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening,
sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. In addition
you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam (injecting a
comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a website offering the
same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this website), the use of
signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web traffic to a site of
interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This includes the
Personal Message feature."



--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>
>
>
>>> You lack honor and discipline.
>
> | No - I don't.
>
> Yes - You do!

You are entitled to an opinion - even when you are wrong!


> | In fact, the 'Management' at Malwarebytes, by choosing not to
> | correspond, have shown very poor management skills.
>
> The management skills of Malwarebytes are excellent as they properly and judiciously
> enforced the rules YOU agreed to abide by.
>
> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules
>
> Terms of Use:
>
> "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening,
> sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. In addition
> you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam (injecting a
> comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a website offering the
> same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this website), the use of
> signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web traffic to a site of
> interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This includes the
> Personal Message feature."
>


Which one (or more) of these words do *you* think best describes the fun
picture, David?

abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or
sexually-oriented

**

I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO
rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to
banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all.

FWIW

--
Dave

[David H. Lipman]

From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>

| sexually-oriented

| **

| I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO
| rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to
| banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all.

You were given two chances.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>
> | sexually-oriented
>
> | **
>
> | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO
> | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to
> | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all.
>
> You were given two chances.
>

So others have said.

I saw no warning - just that the picture had disappeared.

Did you see a warning? It's not visible now.

Nor was I sent an email warning. Why was that, do you think?

From here, it seems as if they were trying to avoid my involvement in
the forums, even though I was an *Honorary* Member!

"There's nowt so queer as folk" as they say in Yorkshire!

--
Dave

[~BD~]

~BD~ wrote:

>
> "There's nowt so queer as folk" as they say in Yorkshire!
>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eDaSvRO9xA

[JD]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>
> | sexually-oriented
>
> | **
>
> | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO
> | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to
> | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all.
>
> You were given two chances.
>

Each time you reply, he comes back with more ignorant bs. He's a fool
asking for others to not be foolish. He seeks the real truth but he
speaks in lies. If you stop replying to boater Dave maybe he'll go away.
Maybe. God I hope so. Probably not.

But it's worth a try. 8-)

--
JD..

[David H. Lipman]

From: "JD" <JD@example.invalid>

| David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>

>> | sexually-oriented

>> | **

>> | I've apologised for posting what was seen as as 'offending' picture. IMO
>> | rules should allow for mistakes being made inadvertently, not be used to
>> | banish folk forever! That makes no sense at all.

>> You were given two chances.


| Each time you reply, he comes back with more ignorant bs. He's a fool
| asking for others to not be foolish. He seeks the real truth but he
| speaks in lies. If you stop replying to boater Dave maybe he'll go away.
| Maybe. God I hope so. Probably not.

| But it's worth a try. 8-)

Thank you. You are right.
I was about to reply but, I read this post and canceled the post.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp