Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?

[Jenn]

"Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9D6CA90C9596CHHI2948AJD832@69.16.185.247.. .
> ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk> wrote in news:uf6dnfDt-
> LfgU0DWnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in
>>> news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> OK - I'm convinced at last.
>>>>
>>>> Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
>>>> **********************************
>>>>
>>>> See post number 3 - here:-
>>>>
>>>> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...l=Malwarebytes
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yay! Thank God...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I wrote to Malwarebytes and apologised, btw.
>>
>> Whilst I can (and have) registered again under another name, I'd prefer
>> to have my ban rescinded and revert to being BD.
>>
>> How would you feel about putting in a good word for me, Dustin?


> Are you smoking crack or heavily drinking? You just told me you forged
> yourself a new identity to evade the BAN previously placed on you, and
> then you want me to put in a good word for you? Laughable, frakking
> laughable. You lack honor and disipline.
>

I'm thinking you're exaggerating quite alot, Dustin. Anyone can register
under any name on any group. Dave just told you he re-registered. He
didn't have to tell you or anyone and could be a member in good standing
under any other username and no one would know... but he TOLD you.

--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[Dustin Cook]

"Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in
news:hrnl78$i8k$1@news.eternal-september.org:

> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9D6CA90C9596CHHI2948AJD832@69.16.185.247.. .
>> ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk> wrote in news:uf6dnfDt-
>> LfgU0DWnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>> ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in
>>>> news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>
>>>>> OK - I'm convinced at last.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
>>>>> **********************************
>>>>>
>>>>> See post number 3 - here:-
>>>>>
>>>>> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...&hl=Malwarebyt
>>>>> es
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yay! Thank God...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I wrote to Malwarebytes and apologised, btw.
>>>
>>> Whilst I can (and have) registered again under another name, I'd
>>> prefer to have my ban rescinded and revert to being BD.
>>>
>>> How would you feel about putting in a good word for me, Dustin?
>
>
>> Are you smoking crack or heavily drinking? You just told me you
>> forged yourself a new identity to evade the BAN previously placed on
>> you, and then you want me to put in a good word for you? Laughable,
>> frakking laughable. You lack honor and disipline.
>>
>
> I'm thinking you're exaggerating quite alot, Dustin. Anyone can
> register under any name on any group. Dave just told you he
> re-registered. He didn't have to tell you or anyone and could be a
> member in good standing under any other username and no one would
> know... but he TOLD you.

Yes, Jenn. Anyone can re-register under any name in any group. When one
chooses to do so, knowing full well he is banned (which is why he's
creating another account in the first place) does *not* in any way show
good intentions, nor respect of any sort towards the forum admins.

If anything, it further justifies the initial ban that was set on his
account.

Further, He wouldn't have to tell me or anyone else he did this. As the
forum admins do audit for security purposes on occasion; his new userid
along with IP would be flagged as belonging to a now banned userID. Ie:
he would be caught eventually.

Clearly you know little about the options available to someone, should
they wish to use them.




--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior

[Dustin Cook]

"Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in
news:hrnl78$i8k$1@news.eternal-september.org:

> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9D6CA90C9596CHHI2948AJD832@69.16.185.247.. .
>> ~BD~ <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk> wrote in news:uf6dnfDt-
>> LfgU0DWnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>> ~BD~<BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in
>>>> news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>
>>>>> OK - I'm convinced at last.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
>>>>> **********************************
>>>>>
>>>>> See post number 3 - here:-
>>>>>
>>>>> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...&hl=Malwarebyt
>>>>> es
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yay! Thank God...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I wrote to Malwarebytes and apologised, btw.
>>>
>>> Whilst I can (and have) registered again under another name, I'd
>>> prefer to have my ban rescinded and revert to being BD.
>>>
>>> How would you feel about putting in a good word for me, Dustin?
>
>
>> Are you smoking crack or heavily drinking? You just told me you
>> forged yourself a new identity to evade the BAN previously placed on
>> you, and then you want me to put in a good word for you? Laughable,
>> frakking laughable. You lack honor and disipline.
>>
>
> I'm thinking you're exaggerating quite alot, Dustin. Anyone can
> register under any name on any group. Dave just told you he
> re-registered. He didn't have to tell you or anyone and could be a
> member in good standing under any other username and no one would
> know... but he TOLD you.

I disagree, Jenn. Anyone can register with any name the person desires,
so long as the follow the forum rules. Having an ID banned and creating
anotherone does not follow the rules; and it can result in tresspass
complaints to his service provider. The fact he was banned negated his
privledges on that site. Accessing that site or any other is a privledge,
not a right and the site admins do have options.

Secondly, He didn't have to tell me anything about creating a new user
account. The site is routely checked to ensure security is being
maintained. His new account would have been flagged using any number of
criteria. I'm not going to get into specifics of how it works, but to
assume he or anyone else can create a new ID after losing another one; is
foolish and somewhat arrogant. Not to mention, highly incorrect. You do
not have anonymity on the internet, you have a false sense of it instead.

The fact he had to register under another name because the admins didn't
want him having an account there is actually a form of digital criminal
tresspass.


--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior

[David H. Lipman]

From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>


| I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no way
| pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to be
| offensive.



http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules

Terms of Use:

"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening,
sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. In addition
you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam (injecting a
comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a website offering the
same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this website), the use of
signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web traffic to a site of
interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This includes the
Personal Message feature."



--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Jenn]

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:hrks1d0a7j@news5.newsguy.com...
> From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>
>
> | I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no way
> | pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to be
> | offensive.
>
>
>
> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules
>
> Terms of Use:
>
> "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful,
> threatening,
> sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable
> laws. In addition
> you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam
> (injecting a
> comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a website
> offering the
> same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this
> website), the use of
> signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web
> traffic to a site of
> interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This
> includes the
> Personal Message feature."
>
>


so whats your point? The image is not any of that.
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[Dustin Cook]

"Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in
news:hrnm1m$l3s$2@news.eternal-september.org:

> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
> news:hrks1d0a7j@news5.newsguy.com...
>> From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>>
>>
>> | I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no
>> | way pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to
>> | be offensive.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules
>>
>> Terms of Use:
>>
>> "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous,
>> hateful, threatening,
>> sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any
>> applicable laws. In addition
>> you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment
>> spam (injecting a
>> comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a
>> website offering the
>> same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this
>> website), the use of
>> signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web
>> traffic to a site of
>> interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples.
>> This includes the
>> Personal Message feature."
>>
>>
>
>
> so whats your point? The image is not any of that.

The image is a front nudie view of a woman. This could fall under obsene
and sexually-oriented. More importantly, the forum posts are at
moderators discretion. Obviously, they found it offensive and eventually
did terminate his account.

The fact he has now gone and created another account; which he did get
caught:

Message-ID: <_uSdnT-CVv_jJ0LWnZ2dnUVZ7oidnZ2d@bt.com>

FYI - Malwarebytes is much sharper than Annexcafe - they *have*
identified me and blocked my registration under my 'new' posting name ..

I believe, Jenn, creating another account to evade a BAN set by an
administrator is also against the terms of service.

--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior

[Max Wachtel]

On Mon, 03 May 2010 19:25:53 -0400, Jenn <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote:

>
>
> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
> news:hrks1d0a7j@news5.newsguy.com...
>> From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hot.mail.co.uk>
>>
>>
>> | I genuinely felt (still feel) that the picture I posted was in no way
>> | pornographic and *was* meant simply in fun - *not* intended to be
>> | offensive.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?act=boardrules
>>
>> Terms of Use:
>>
>> "You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous,
>> hateful,
>> threatening,
>> sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable
>> laws. In addition
>> you will not engage in any sort of spamming, whether it is comment spam
>> (injecting a
>> comment into a thread for the purpose of placing a link back to a
>> website
>> offering the
>> same services offered here; or services totally unrelated to this
>> website), the use of
>> signature links deemed to be for the sole purpose of increasing web
>> traffic to a site of
>> interest by the member, or any combination of those two examples. This
>> includes the
>> Personal Message feature."
>>
>>
>
>
> so whats your point? The image is not any of that.

I asked my wife what she thought of the image and she said that she "was
offended, it was vulgar and should not be on a public forum".
--
This post was created using Opera@USB: http://www.opera-usb.com
Virus Removal Instructions
http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home
Max's Favorite Freeware
http://sites.google.com/site/keeping...clean/freeware
I'm Max Wachtel and I approve this message.

[Bullwinkle]

Nobody cares if you do or not.

Stop Cross posting, you are a virus.




"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in message
news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com...
OK - I'm convinced at last.

Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
**********************************

See post number 3 - here:-

http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...l=Malwarebytes

--
Dave

[FromTheRafters]

"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in message
news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com...
> OK - I'm convinced at last.
>
> Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
> **********************************
>
> See post number 3 - here:-
>
> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...l=Malwarebytes

It must be a very simple application indeed to be 100% safe.

I would say that the programmers are probably 100% well intentioned.

(is McAfee 100% safe?)

[David H. Lipman]

From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic@nomail.afraid.org>

| "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in message
| news:etmdnSAlabunKkTWnZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@bt.com...
>> OK - I'm convinced at last.

>> Mbam *is* a 100% safe application!
>> **********************************

>> See post number 3 - here:-

>> http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php...l=Malwarebytes

| It must be a very simple application indeed to be 100% safe.

| I would say that the programmers are probably 100% well intentioned.

| (is McAfee 100% safe?)



I truly think that logic would be above his capability.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp