This group really sucks

[Peter Foldes]

Another friend of BD's from the UK

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"PajaP" <pajap@news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message

[Peter Foldes]

Jenn

What is expected is bad behavior in words toward you Jenn. I do not need you to be
afraid of me and yes I have come across many females that say the same as you and I
have learned over the years that it is a defensive reaction only. The only female
that I am afraid or was ever afraid of was my Mom and my wife because I gave them
that respect but obviously you will not get that from me.
To you or of you all I can say is that I laugh it off since it is a sign of
insecurity and a defensive statement.
Go and play in the leagues where you belong which is the old hags chatroom.There you
can be Queen Bee for the day.

You never listened. Now to show that I am correct with I said above you will retort
to being offensively \defensive with your reply post. This is so plain and evident
of you and it shows your insecurity in plain view for everyone to see.

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message
news:hqogpv$h5r$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hqog0g$a5r$1@speranza.aioe.org...

[PajaP]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:32:39 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Jenn
>
>LOL. You are so predictable. You are a retard.

Add to the list below:
They will use personal insults against you.

> You did not understand and you never
>will when you are told and asked nicely to keep your nose out of the affairs between
>myself and all others when it comes to that Troll BD (Boater Dave alias David (no
>brain) Brooks. Your on line experience with everybody would be so much better.
>Since you stick up for that arshole then do not expect any nicer treatment as you
>are receiving at present and will continue to receive from others now and in the
>future.
>Stay in your own yard is the best policy
>
>Last time I tell you this above Jenn. Told you many times and you do not take heed.
>Well.sweetie then expect the expected.
>

Add to the list below:
You must only post when you have sought their permission.

>OK. Time for your last word as usual from you. Awaiting it with great expectation

Remember, the *regulars* must have the last word and will use childish
reverse psychology in an attempt to do so.


Group rules:
-----
*You must regularly post the reason you are reading/posting in this
group.
*You must like who the *regulars* like.
*You must dislike who the *regulars* dislike.
*You must post at least 10 anti pcbutts comments a day.
*You must always reply to a pcbutts post and must have a pre-prepared
template to do so.
*You must only recommend the *regulars* preferred anti-malware products.
*You must only use the anti-malware comparison and information web sites
the *regulars* use.
*You must be impressed by the *regulars* qualifications and day jobs.
*You must be scared by the *regulars* threats to sue.
*You must not post more than 1 on topic post a day (zero is the
preferred number).
*You must only post when you have sought the *regulars* permission.
*Never, never have any opinion that does not 100% agree with the
regulars*. If you do you will be:
***Hounded until you do.
***You will be called a troll (which is their favourite insult).
***They will use personal insults against you.
Above all, remember, "Resistance is futile"!
-----

[PajaP]

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:45:19 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Another friend of BD's from the UK

Add to list below:
They (even the clueless newbie regulars) will always pretend to *know*
you.


Group rules:
-----
*You must regularly post the reason you are reading/posting in this
group.
*You must like who the *regulars* like.
*You must dislike who the *regulars* dislike.
*You must post at least 10 anti pcbutts comments a day.
*You must always reply to a pcbutts post and must have a pre-prepared
template to do so.
*You must only recommend the *regulars* preferred anti-malware products.
*You must only use the anti-malware comparison and information web sites
the *regulars* use.
*You must be impressed by the *regulars* qualifications and day jobs.
*You must be scared by the *regulars* threats to sue.
*You must not post more than 1 on topic post a day (zero is the
preferred number).
*You must only post when you have sought the *regulars* permission.
*Never, never have any opinion that does not 100% agree with the
regulars*. If you do you will be:
***Hounded until you do.
***You will be called a troll (which is their favourite insult).
***They will use personal insults against you.
***They will always pretend to *know* you.
Above all, remember, "Resistance is futile"!
-----

[Peter Foldes]

How is your buddy BD(David Brooks). You are as evident as he is. LOL

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"PajaP" <pajap@news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:joovs5pg7rsq92h0rctidepfpr1pohgddn@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:32:39 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Jenn
>>
>>LOL. You are so predictable. You are a retard.
>
> Add to the list below:
> They will use personal insults against you.
>
>> You did not understand and you never
>>will when you are told and asked nicely to keep your nose out of the affairs
>>between
>>myself and all others when it comes to that Troll BD (Boater Dave alias David (no
>>brain) Brooks. Your on line experience with everybody would be so much better.
>>Since you stick up for that arshole then do not expect any nicer treatment as you
>>are receiving at present and will continue to receive from others now and in the
>>future.
>>Stay in your own yard is the best policy
>>
>>Last time I tell you this above Jenn. Told you many times and you do not take
>>heed.
>>Well.sweetie then expect the expected.
>>
>
> Add to the list below:
> You must only post when you have sought their permission.
>
>>OK. Time for your last word as usual from you. Awaiting it with great expectation
>
> Remember, the *regulars* must have the last word and will use childish
> reverse psychology in an attempt to do so.
>
>
> Group rules:
> -----
> *You must regularly post the reason you are reading/posting in this
> group.
> *You must like who the *regulars* like.
> *You must dislike who the *regulars* dislike.
> *You must post at least 10 anti pcbutts comments a day.
> *You must always reply to a pcbutts post and must have a pre-prepared
> template to do so.
> *You must only recommend the *regulars* preferred anti-malware products.
> *You must only use the anti-malware comparison and information web sites
> the *regulars* use.
> *You must be impressed by the *regulars* qualifications and day jobs.
> *You must be scared by the *regulars* threats to sue.
> *You must not post more than 1 on topic post a day (zero is the
> preferred number).
> *You must only post when you have sought the *regulars* permission.
> *Never, never have any opinion that does not 100% agree with the
> regulars*. If you do you will be:
> ***Hounded until you do.
> ***You will be called a troll (which is their favourite insult).
> ***They will use personal insults against you.
> Above all, remember, "Resistance is futile"!
> -----

[Peter Foldes]

PajaP

>>Another friend of BD's from the UK

Yep and you just verified my statement above

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"PajaP" <pajap@news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:2hpvs5lu3s7clbevh1rbfmplhtdrhn1ihq@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:45:19 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Another friend of BD's from the UK
>
> Add to list below:
> They (even the clueless newbie regulars) will always pretend to *know*
> you.
>
>
> Group rules:
> -----
> *You must regularly post the reason you are reading/posting in this
> group.
> *You must like who the *regulars* like.
> *You must dislike who the *regulars* dislike.
> *You must post at least 10 anti pcbutts comments a day.
> *You must always reply to a pcbutts post and must have a pre-prepared
> template to do so.
> *You must only recommend the *regulars* preferred anti-malware products.
> *You must only use the anti-malware comparison and information web sites
> the *regulars* use.
> *You must be impressed by the *regulars* qualifications and day jobs.
> *You must be scared by the *regulars* threats to sue.
> *You must not post more than 1 on topic post a day (zero is the
> preferred number).
> *You must only post when you have sought the *regulars* permission.
> *Never, never have any opinion that does not 100% agree with the
> regulars*. If you do you will be:
> ***Hounded until you do.
> ***You will be called a troll (which is their favourite insult).
> ***They will use personal insults against you.
> ***They will always pretend to *know* you.
> Above all, remember, "Resistance is futile"!
> -----

[PajaP]

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:08:28 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
wrote:

How is your buddy pcbutts. You are as evident as he is. LOL

[PajaP]

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:10:10 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Peter Foldes, is another friend of pcbuts's from the USA.

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>> How is your buddy BD(David Brooks). You are as evident as he is. LOL
>>
>> --
>> Peter


I'm fine, Peter ........ albeit somewhat worn out with all my painting!

I note that you are up late again - problem sleeping once more?

Be nice, then you'll have no problem sleeping!

--
Dave

[Stuart Saunders]

Dave and Max, thanks for the warm welcome, it is appreciated.

Still waiting for a response from TRT/PCB ….

In response to those who criticise anyone who attempts to warn new/
unsuspecting/unknowing posters of the character and online activities
of Butts, which include thief, compulsive liar, no understanding of
the stolen scripts he promotes, lack of knowledge, bad ethcic/morals.
Whilst some take issue with a particular point, others choose more
general warnings, irrespective of their chosen methods it must be
acknowledged they have been mainly successful in preventing the
distribution and use of Remove-it which should NEVER be run on any
computer.
Even if we overlook content he has added which many consider to be
malicious, users are being subjected to his lack of understanding
commands and how other peoples scripts work which is dangerous to the
end user.

1) In response to the very occasional variant which hooks into a
computers winsock stack, Butts added a line of code to utilise the
netsh command, this runs each and every time irrespective of whether
the winsock has been infected, here are a couple of comments from
Microsoft regarding netsh

Warning, Programs that access or monitor the Internet such as
antivirus, firewall, or proxy clients may be negatively affected when
you run the netsh winsock reset command.

Warning, The netsh int ip reset command will reset all IP
information, default gateway information, and DNS server information.
Before you restart the computer after you run this command, you must
configure your TCP/IP settings.

2) A registry script called Nfig.reg has been added which will remove
some system and explorer registry keys and not replace them their
default (or any other) values.

3) More worryingly, he insists on promoting its use on Windows 2000
systems despite the scripts being written specifically for XP,
differences between the two systems (well one in particular) is likely
to render the computer with 2000 highly unstable or inoperable.

Any person who puts a users computer to those risks in any forum is
very untrustworthy and unreliable and will, quite rightly be exposed
by those who have a genuine intention to help others as often as the
perpetrator makes it necessary.
Any person who defends or supports such activities will also, quite
rightly be subject to similar criticism or ridicule without a
justifiable objection.

Far worse than these debates is the potential consequences if users
were not warned of Butts


Stuart