"Mike Easter" <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:83350kFrb1U1@mid.individual.net...
> ~BD~ wrote:
<snip>
> mbam had a legal conflict with IOBit, claiming iobit infringed IP. During
> that battle would have been a good time for iobit to claim that mbam
> harbored 'gremlins', but it did not. It only claimed that it didn't
> intentionally infringe IP and that remedies had been taken about mbam's
> concerns.
>


What does *infringe IP* mean?
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)
http://pqlr.org/bbs/