John Mason Jr <notvalid@cox.net.invalid> wrote in
news:hqhqvq$i2p$1@news.eternal-september.org:

> On 4/19/2010 4:40 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> BD said
>>
>>> Maybe someone like David Kaye has the experience to determine if a
>>> machine is actually clean after installing and running MBAM.
>>> Someone, surely, has carried out an independent check to give such a
>>> widely used
>>> facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM is obviously highly
>>> effective at removing 'malware' why is it considered impossible for
>>> the
>>> downloaded software to leave its own gremlin within the cleaned
>>> machine?
>>
>> Dustin Cook said
>>
>> Malwarebytes has thousands of happy users, gets praise every single
>> day on many forums; continues to be one of the top rated downloads
>> for antimalware at cnet.com. What you claim just doesn't jive with
>> reality. Your consiperacy theory BS aside, that is.
>>
>> ******
>>
>> My question remains unanswered.
>>
>> I'm *not* claiming anything - just seeking the truth!
>>
>
> If you were really seeking the truth you would find a reputable firm
> to do the analysis you want and pay them.
>
> Actually to make sure you get the right results contract 3 firms
> separately, be sure to post the results when you are done.
>
> John

When he's finished with that, I'd like a nice full formal apology on
behalf of mbam and myself for the innuendo remarks. Well, I'll take the
one for me, mbam can deal with him on their own time.




--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh..
nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior