Ping: Dustin

[Jenn]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> Jenn
> This is not a discussion for this newsgroup.

Hey... I didn't bring it up originally. I read various threads off and on
for a while and only responded to what other people have said thus far.

> You are wrong and he has you eating out of his hand.

If I'm wrong, I'll eventually find out for myself and then deal with
whatever I'm wrong about straight up and to the point.

> He is using other people to communicate
> with you and passing them off as his family.

I've seen his family photos.. vacation photos ... photos of weddings ...
photos of his military service ... heck.. I've even seen his insurance
policy he has on his narrowboat... maybe I should ask to see his wedding
license?? Seeing is believing for me anyway.

> I will not answer to your reply because obviously knowing you, you
> need to have the last word.
> You want to continue a dialogue with me then I have told you what to
> do to get to email. I will not do it your way so please refresh the
> method to contact me

I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth directly, Peter.
How do I know you won't try to harm my computer through email? You have not
given me a reason to trust you, yet.

--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday>

< snip >

| I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth directly, Peter.
| How do I know you won't try to harm my computer through email? You have not
| given me a reason to trust you, yet.

Peter will cause you and your computer no harm and you are totally naive about BoaterDave.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[T.H]

On 4/17/2010 8:03 AM, David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~"<BoaterDaveNoSpam@Hotmail.co.uk>
>
> | Jenn wrote:
>>>> What gives you the right to tell me whether or not to
>>>> respond to anyone, especially if they have made a comment regarding
>>>> me in their post?
>
>>>> I am up front with how I feel about things, so there isn't any me
>>>> *showing* what I'm all about, because I am just who I am all the
>>>> time. I say what is on my mind.
>
>>>> You did not answer my question, either. Do you want to try to be
>>>> friends or not? Friends should be able to be up front with each
>>>> other and even disagree on issues from time to time.. and still be
>>>> able to maintain their friendship. I don't have to agree with
>>>> everything you say and vice versa in order to be friends with
>>>> someone. I'm willing to keep trying if you are willing.
>>>> --
>>>> Jenn (from Oklahoma)
>>>> http://pqlr.org/bbs/
>
>
> | Hi Jenn!
>
> | There is something of the night about Peter Foldes, as I've mentioned
> | many times.
>
> | He most certainly will show you no respect whatever, mark my words.
>
> | Dustin? A good guy? He has had me banned/excluded from Malwarebytes,
> | rather that have a continuing dialogue. That is *not* good behaviour
> | IMO. Maybe someone has something to hide there after all? Maybe you
> | should visit and read the posts I've made there in the past - I did give
> | them the benefit of the doubt initially but, it now appears,
> | erroneously!
> | --
> | Dave - working really hard on the boat PF says I do not own! ;-)
>
> It wasn't Dustin who got you banned!
>
> YOU got yourself banned because you have no clue what is appropriate or inappropriate
> behaviour.
>
> Posting the soft porn picture in the Easter thread got you banned. The first time you
> posted it, it was summarily removed. When you posted it a second time Marcin's minions
> pulled your plug w/o hesitation. Your bad mouthing of MBAM didn't help either.
> Malwarebytes' personnel were not happy with your Usenet posts and the comment on Butts'
> blog. That put you on their sh!t list. The soft porn picture was the straw that broke
> the perverbial camel's back.
>
> /* You're a clueless moron. */
>
Since you might not do this for yourself...

+1

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday>
>>
>> < snip >
>>
>>> I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth
>>> directly, Peter. How do I know you won't try to harm my computer
>>> through email? You have not given me a reason to trust you, yet.
>>
>> Peter will cause you and your computer no harm and you are totally
>> naive about BoaterDave.


How can you *possibly* know whether or not Peter Foldes intends harm to
others?

Are you and Peter members of the same club, David Lipman? Just tell the
truth. You are both Jewish - yes? There is no need to be ashamed about
that in 2010.

I have always answered every question asked of *me* truthfully. Jenn has
taken the time and trouble to learn the truth. She is straight-forward
and honest and takes an unbiased view. She *knows* that I seek only the
*truth*!

Bad guys *will* be caught out. It is only a matter of time! ;-)

--
Dave

[Peter Foldes]

> Are you and Peter members of the same club, David Lipman? Just tell the
> truth. You are both Jewish - yes? There is no need to be ashamed about
> that in 2010.


You discriminating friggin idiot Troll. You are one sick SOB

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam@Hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hqd5cq$cc0$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday>
>>>
>>> < snip >
>>>
>>>> I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth
>>>> directly, Peter. How do I know you won't try to harm my computer
>>>> through email? You have not given me a reason to trust you, yet.
>>>
>>> Peter will cause you and your computer no harm and you are totally
>>> naive about BoaterDave.
>
>
> How can you *possibly* know whether or not Peter Foldes intends harm to
> others?
>
> Are you and Peter members of the same club, David Lipman? Just tell the
> truth. You are both Jewish - yes? There is no need to be ashamed about
> that in 2010.
>
> I have always answered every question asked of *me* truthfully. Jenn has
> taken the time and trouble to learn the truth. She is straight-forward
> and honest and takes an unbiased view. She *knows* that I seek only the
> *truth*!
>
> Bad guys *will* be caught out. It is only a matter of time! ;-)
>
> --
> Dave
>
>

[Jenn]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Jenn" <nope@noway.atnohow.anyday>
>
> < snip >
>
>> I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth
>> directly, Peter. How do I know you won't try to harm my computer
>> through email? You have not given me a reason to trust you, yet.
>
> Peter will cause you and your computer no harm

I don't know you at all, David Lipman...... As I mentioned before in a
previous post, I am not quick to trust anyone, and right now, I don't have
any reason to trust you or Peter, YET, anyway. Give me a reason to trust
either one of you? I'm not opposed to having my mind changed.

>and you are totally naive about BoaterDave.

I don't believe so. If the future shows me I was wrong, I'll deal with it
accordingly. Until that time, I am ok with where I stand now with Dave
(BD).

--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[David H. Lipman]

From: "ASCII" <me2@privacy.net>

| Jenn wrote:

>>I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth directly, Peter.
>>How do I know you won't try to harm my computer through email? You have not
>>given me a reason to trust you, yet.

| Maybe in some situations there could be a danger via email,
| but with a properly configured setup,
| and enough personal restraint to not execute, run, click on etc.
| any attachments, an email exchange should be quite innocuous.

| Now go and lambaste me for 'butting in' with my 2 pence comment,
| ...as if it ever matters in an [ALT] hierarchy.

You are correct. Especially if the email is kept to putre text and no RTF.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Leythos]

In article <hqd3oc$dro$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
nope@noway.atnohow.anyday says...
> I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth directly, Peter.
> How do I know you won't try to harm my computer through email? You have not
> given me a reason to trust you, yet.
>
>

If you know enough to do basic security measures on a computer you can
easily secure a PC - you could even open a GMAIL or some free account
and use that so that we don't have to see this crap that is completely
OT.

--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

[Jenn]

ASCII wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>>
>> I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth
>> directly, Peter. How do I know you won't try to harm my computer
>> through email? You have not given me a reason to trust you, yet.


> Maybe in some situations there could be a danger via email,
> but with a properly configured setup,
> and enough personal restraint to not execute, run, click on etc.
> any attachments, an email exchange should be quite innocuous.
>
> Now go and lambaste me for 'butting in' with my 2 pence comment,
> ...as if it ever matters in an [ALT] hierarchy.


No problem from me..ASCII ... thanks for the info. I'm usually very careful
about not opening attachments or clicking on anything. I just don't know if
it is safe for me to email him or not. If I thought it was safe, I wouldn't
mind.

btw.. I don't know you, but nice to meet you.
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)

[Jenn]

Leythos wrote:
> In article <hqd3oc$dro$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
> nope@noway.atnohow.anyday says...
>> I don't really trust you enough to email you back and forth
>> directly, Peter. How do I know you won't try to harm my computer
>> through email? You have not given me a reason to trust you, yet.


> If you know enough to do basic security measures on a computer you can
> easily secure a PC - you could even open a GMAIL or some free account
> and use that so that we don't have to see this crap that is completely
> OT.

I already have both hotmail and gmail accounts for various uses. It doesn't
mean I trust someone enough to email back and forth with them.

Is someone forcing you to read?

--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)