In article <hpl6ef$2n1$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
me@nowhere.whocareswhatthisemailisanyway says...
> You used the wikipedia definition of Intenet troll to back up your premise
> about off-topic posts... that definition includes the idea that calling
> anyone a troll would also apply the definition to their bent towards posting
> off-topic posts...
>
> Meaning.. the application of the term troll ... would include the part of
> off-topic posts ... would also be highly subjective and could be taken just
> as equally by others as an on-topic post.
>

To do as you suggest you would have to ignore the first parts that I
posted, defining what is OFF-TOPIC based on the groups name/topic.

Thanks for showing, based on your last line, that his posts follow the
definition of "off-topic" as well as his own suggestion that chaos is
permitted because he wants it and doesn't care about the standards or
rules.

--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)